Between regulation and instruction: a cross-linguistic comparison of Swiss grammar school curricula exemplified by the subject “economics and law”

Nicole Ackermann, Thomas Ruoss
{"title":"Between regulation and instruction: a cross-linguistic comparison of Swiss grammar school curricula exemplified by the subject “economics and law”","authors":"Nicole Ackermann, Thomas Ruoss","doi":"10.33683/dida.22.05.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the federal education system in Switzerland, grammar schools’ curricula differ be-tween cantons and even between schools. Such differences may become apparent in a curriculum analysis regarding a specific subject, in our case “economics and law”. This study focuses on economic education and compares curricular content between subject types and across language regions. We compiled a representative dataset and qualitatively analysed subject content in these curricula by a multidisciplinary coding system. The results show that the curricula of the introductory subject are heterogeneous and those of the major subject are rather homogeneous. In the German-language curricula the two subfields of “economics” and “business administration” are equally weighted, whereas in the Roman-language curricula, “economics” is more dominant. We conclude that the so-called “variants of a capitalist spirit” become evident across language regions and are reflected in grammar school curricula. Furthermore, schools use various conceptions of economic education, especially in the introductory subject. Our findings on cultural differences in economic education may be fruitful for curriculum analysis in other subjects and for future curriculum design.","PeriodicalId":264836,"journal":{"name":"Atti del 5° Convegno sulle didattiche disciplinari","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atti del 5° Convegno sulle didattiche disciplinari","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33683/dida.22.05.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the federal education system in Switzerland, grammar schools’ curricula differ be-tween cantons and even between schools. Such differences may become apparent in a curriculum analysis regarding a specific subject, in our case “economics and law”. This study focuses on economic education and compares curricular content between subject types and across language regions. We compiled a representative dataset and qualitatively analysed subject content in these curricula by a multidisciplinary coding system. The results show that the curricula of the introductory subject are heterogeneous and those of the major subject are rather homogeneous. In the German-language curricula the two subfields of “economics” and “business administration” are equally weighted, whereas in the Roman-language curricula, “economics” is more dominant. We conclude that the so-called “variants of a capitalist spirit” become evident across language regions and are reflected in grammar school curricula. Furthermore, schools use various conceptions of economic education, especially in the introductory subject. Our findings on cultural differences in economic education may be fruitful for curriculum analysis in other subjects and for future curriculum design.
法规与教学之间:以“经济与法律”为例的瑞士文法学校课程的跨语言比较
由于瑞士的联邦教育系统,文法学校的课程在各州之间,甚至在学校之间都是不同的。这种差异可能会在关于特定学科的课程分析中变得明显,在我们的案例中是“经济与法律”。本研究以经济教育为重点,比较不同学科类型和不同语言地区的课程内容。我们编制了一个具有代表性的数据集,并通过多学科编码系统对这些课程中的学科内容进行了定性分析。结果表明,初级学科的课程设置具有异质性,而主修学科的课程设置具有较强的同质性。在德语课程中,“经济学”和“工商管理”这两个子领域的权重相等,而在罗马语课程中,“经济学”更占主导地位。我们得出的结论是,所谓的“资本主义精神的变体”在语言地区变得明显,并反映在文法学校的课程中。此外,学校使用各种经济教育的概念,特别是在入门课程中。我们关于经济教育中文化差异的研究结果可能对其他学科的课程分析和未来的课程设计有所帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信