Active Learning and Occupational Therapy Theory: A Mixed Methods Study of a Course Redesign

M. Feldhacker, Diana R. Feldhacker
{"title":"Active Learning and Occupational Therapy Theory: A Mixed Methods Study of a Course Redesign","authors":"M. Feldhacker, Diana R. Feldhacker","doi":"10.26681/jote.2022.060403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of theory to guide practice is what distinguishes an occupational therapist’s professional judgment and reasoning from simply technical skills. However, occupational therapists continue to lack confidence and skills in understanding application of theory to inform practice. Thus, effective course design related to theory is imperative in professional formation. This study assessed the effectiveness of a graduate-level occupational therapy theory course redesigned using andragogical, learner-centered, and active learning principles to address gaps in applying and understanding theory. A mixed methods retrospective cohort design was utilized. This included a pretest/post-test survey along with end-ofsemester course and instructor evaluation. Eighty-four students engaged in the course and completed pre/post-testing and end of course evaluations. Course and instructor evaluations from an original (preredesign) cohort of 28 students were used for comparison. Results suggest that the course redesign was effective at helping students understand and apply occupational therapy theory in a real-world context while also being able to articulate the importance of theory-guided practice. Instructors should structure theory coursework around andragogical, learner-centered, and active learning principles to improve engagement and interaction with theoretical concepts. Results of this study can inform instructors in best practices and student preferences when instructing theory-related coursework and how to create learning opportunities which have distinct value in creating occupational therapy practitioners who are confident in utilizing theory to inform practice decisions.","PeriodicalId":304291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Therapy Education","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Therapy Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2022.060403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of theory to guide practice is what distinguishes an occupational therapist’s professional judgment and reasoning from simply technical skills. However, occupational therapists continue to lack confidence and skills in understanding application of theory to inform practice. Thus, effective course design related to theory is imperative in professional formation. This study assessed the effectiveness of a graduate-level occupational therapy theory course redesigned using andragogical, learner-centered, and active learning principles to address gaps in applying and understanding theory. A mixed methods retrospective cohort design was utilized. This included a pretest/post-test survey along with end-ofsemester course and instructor evaluation. Eighty-four students engaged in the course and completed pre/post-testing and end of course evaluations. Course and instructor evaluations from an original (preredesign) cohort of 28 students were used for comparison. Results suggest that the course redesign was effective at helping students understand and apply occupational therapy theory in a real-world context while also being able to articulate the importance of theory-guided practice. Instructors should structure theory coursework around andragogical, learner-centered, and active learning principles to improve engagement and interaction with theoretical concepts. Results of this study can inform instructors in best practices and student preferences when instructing theory-related coursework and how to create learning opportunities which have distinct value in creating occupational therapy practitioners who are confident in utilizing theory to inform practice decisions.
主动学习与职业治疗理论:课程重新设计的混合方法研究
运用理论指导实践是职业治疗师的专业判断和推理与简单的技术技能的区别所在。然而,职业治疗师在理解理论应用于实践方面仍然缺乏信心和技能。因此,在专业形成过程中,有效的理论相关课程设计势在必行。本研究评估了重新设计的研究生水平职业治疗理论课程的有效性,该课程采用了以学习者为中心和主动学习的原则来解决应用和理解理论的差距。采用混合方法回顾性队列设计。这包括测试前/测试后的调查,以及学期末的课程和教师评估。84名学生参加了课程,并完成了课程前/后测试和课程结束评估。28名学生的课程和教师评价被用于比较。结果表明,重新设计的课程能够有效地帮助学生理解和在现实环境中应用职业治疗理论,同时也能够阐明理论指导实践的重要性。教师应该围绕理性的、以学习者为中心的和主动的学习原则来组织理论课程,以提高与理论概念的接触和互动。本研究的结果可以告知教师在指导理论相关课程时的最佳实践和学生偏好,以及如何创造学习机会,这些机会对培养有信心利用理论来指导实践决策的职业治疗从业人员具有独特的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信