The Idea of a Rural Informal Economy

J. Conroy
{"title":"The Idea of a Rural Informal Economy","authors":"J. Conroy","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2294764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to explore the notion of economic informality and its application in the rural context of developing and transitional economies, applying Keith Hart's (1987) notion of informality as a 'remedial concept'. Some remedy is needed to make sense of the many 'palpable discrepancies' observed between the prescriptions of an economic orthodoxy -- whether of a socialist command economy or a 'marketizing' economy attempting to apply the value chain proposition -- and the 'concrete conditions' of rural life in such economies. The circumstance, that most such economies are only partially 'institutionalized' to whatever economic orthodoxy is being applied in the realm of public policy, throws up the behaviours we recognize as economic informality. In 'marketizing' rural societies the continuing influence of traditional elements, such as household subsistence production, non-market exchange between affines and neighbours, and landholding subject to customary tenure arrangements, may help to explain the phenomenon of partial institutionalization. The tenacity of informality in such economies, and the necessarily slow pace at which small farmer households can be incorporated within formal value chains, should urge us to the more careful study of rural informality and its strengths, to enable these to be harnessed. The advice of Hazell (2011), that it will be necessary 'to make food staples markets work better for small farms', seems a good starting point.","PeriodicalId":208075,"journal":{"name":"PRN: Distributive & Economic Justice","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRN: Distributive & Economic Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2294764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore the notion of economic informality and its application in the rural context of developing and transitional economies, applying Keith Hart's (1987) notion of informality as a 'remedial concept'. Some remedy is needed to make sense of the many 'palpable discrepancies' observed between the prescriptions of an economic orthodoxy -- whether of a socialist command economy or a 'marketizing' economy attempting to apply the value chain proposition -- and the 'concrete conditions' of rural life in such economies. The circumstance, that most such economies are only partially 'institutionalized' to whatever economic orthodoxy is being applied in the realm of public policy, throws up the behaviours we recognize as economic informality. In 'marketizing' rural societies the continuing influence of traditional elements, such as household subsistence production, non-market exchange between affines and neighbours, and landholding subject to customary tenure arrangements, may help to explain the phenomenon of partial institutionalization. The tenacity of informality in such economies, and the necessarily slow pace at which small farmer households can be incorporated within formal value chains, should urge us to the more careful study of rural informality and its strengths, to enable these to be harnessed. The advice of Hazell (2011), that it will be necessary 'to make food staples markets work better for small farms', seems a good starting point.
农村非正规经济的概念
本文的目的是探讨经济非正式性的概念及其在发展中经济体和转型经济体的农村背景下的应用,应用基思·哈特(1987)的非正式性概念作为“补救概念”。我们需要一些补救措施来理解经济正统的处方——无论是社会主义指令经济还是试图应用价值链主张的“市场化”经济——与这些经济体中农村生活的“具体情况”之间的许多“明显差异”。在这种情况下,大多数这样的经济体只是部分地“制度化”了任何在公共政策领域应用的经济正统,这引发了我们认为是经济非正式性的行为。在“市场化”的农村社会中,传统因素的持续影响,如家庭生计生产、亲民与邻居之间的非市场交换以及受习惯权属安排约束的土地持有,可能有助于解释部分制度化的现象。这些经济体中非正规性的顽固存在,以及小农家庭融入正规价值链的步伐必然缓慢,应该促使我们更仔细地研究农村非正规性及其优势,以便利用这些优势。Hazell(2011)的建议,即有必要“使主食市场更好地为小农场服务”,似乎是一个很好的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信