Clinical Evaluation of Efficacy of Cyanoacrylate Glue and Conventional Polypropylene Suturing in Cutaneous Wounds-A Comparitive Study

M. Alakananda
{"title":"Clinical Evaluation of Efficacy of Cyanoacrylate Glue and Conventional Polypropylene Suturing in Cutaneous Wounds-A Comparitive Study","authors":"M. Alakananda","doi":"10.33552/OJOR.2021.04.000595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The benefits of assisting closure by holding the opposing edges of a wound together have been recognized in the last 5000 years. There are several well-proven techniques of skin closure using a variety of materials like braided or monofilament material, absorbable and nonabsorbable conventional suture materials, metal clips and adhesive tapes. Conventional skin suturing techniques do have certain disadvantages. From the past three decades, many new biomaterials have been discovered in the medical field. Bio-adhesives are one among them. These materials when applied on the incised tissues possess the ability to bind them together. This group of adhesives are called Cyanoacrylates. The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy and clinical outcome of the two techniques of wound closure by using conventional polypropylene suturing and cyanoacrylate glue. Objectives of the study: The objective of this study was to compare the pain, duration of the procedure, postoperative infection, wound dehiscence and esthetic outcome of cyanoacrylate with the polypropylene suturing in skin wounds. Materials and method: A total number of 50 subjects, with lacerations of head and neck region in the age group of 15-40 years were included in the study. Group I: Lacerations closed using polypropylene Group II: Lacerations closed using cyanoacrylates Variables like pain, esthetic outcome, time taken, wound dehiscence, infection was taken into account. Conclusion: In our study we noted that cyanoacrylates is an easily applied material, has good physical properties, has good wound healing characteristics, overcomes the disadvantage and discomfort of suture removal, infection, duration of closure and produces cosmesis comparable to that produced by sutures with excellent patient satisfaction. With a limited number of samples and study, we conclude that with a proper patient selection, meticulous technique and limitation to external use, Cyanoacrylate can serve as a good and reliable alternative to sutures for lacerated wounds in the minimal tension areas of the face.","PeriodicalId":365490,"journal":{"name":"Online Journal of Otolaryngology and Rhinology","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Journal of Otolaryngology and Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33552/OJOR.2021.04.000595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The benefits of assisting closure by holding the opposing edges of a wound together have been recognized in the last 5000 years. There are several well-proven techniques of skin closure using a variety of materials like braided or monofilament material, absorbable and nonabsorbable conventional suture materials, metal clips and adhesive tapes. Conventional skin suturing techniques do have certain disadvantages. From the past three decades, many new biomaterials have been discovered in the medical field. Bio-adhesives are one among them. These materials when applied on the incised tissues possess the ability to bind them together. This group of adhesives are called Cyanoacrylates. The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy and clinical outcome of the two techniques of wound closure by using conventional polypropylene suturing and cyanoacrylate glue. Objectives of the study: The objective of this study was to compare the pain, duration of the procedure, postoperative infection, wound dehiscence and esthetic outcome of cyanoacrylate with the polypropylene suturing in skin wounds. Materials and method: A total number of 50 subjects, with lacerations of head and neck region in the age group of 15-40 years were included in the study. Group I: Lacerations closed using polypropylene Group II: Lacerations closed using cyanoacrylates Variables like pain, esthetic outcome, time taken, wound dehiscence, infection was taken into account. Conclusion: In our study we noted that cyanoacrylates is an easily applied material, has good physical properties, has good wound healing characteristics, overcomes the disadvantage and discomfort of suture removal, infection, duration of closure and produces cosmesis comparable to that produced by sutures with excellent patient satisfaction. With a limited number of samples and study, we conclude that with a proper patient selection, meticulous technique and limitation to external use, Cyanoacrylate can serve as a good and reliable alternative to sutures for lacerated wounds in the minimal tension areas of the face.
氰基丙烯酸酯胶与常规聚丙烯缝合皮肤创面的临床疗效比较研究
简介:在过去的5000年里,人们已经认识到通过将伤口的相对边缘保持在一起来帮助闭合的好处。有几种经过验证的皮肤闭合技术,使用各种材料,如编织或单丝材料,可吸收和不可吸收的传统缝合材料,金属夹和胶带。传统的皮肤缝合技术确实有一定的缺点。在过去的三十年里,在医学领域发现了许多新的生物材料。生物胶粘剂就是其中之一。当将这些材料应用于切割的组织时,它们具有将它们结合在一起的能力。这类粘合剂被称为氰基丙烯酸酯。本研究的目的是比较常规聚丙烯缝合和氰基丙烯酸酯胶缝合两种缝合方法的疗效和临床效果。研究目的:本研究的目的是比较氰基丙烯酸酯和聚丙烯缝合在皮肤伤口中的疼痛、手术时间、术后感染、伤口裂开和美观效果。材料与方法:选取年龄15 ~ 40岁的头颈部有撕裂伤的患者50例。第1组:聚丙烯缝合伤口第2组:氰基丙烯酸酯缝合伤口考虑疼痛、美观、时间、伤口裂开、感染等因素。结论:在我们的研究中,我们注意到氰基丙烯酸酯是一种易于应用的材料,具有良好的物理性能,具有良好的伤口愈合特性,克服了缝线拆除、感染、缝合时间等缺点和不适,并产生了与缝线相当的美容效果,患者满意度很高。通过有限的样本和研究,我们得出结论,通过适当的患者选择,细致的技术和限制外用,氰基丙烯酸酯可以作为面部最小张力区域撕裂伤伤口缝合的良好可靠的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信