Manifest destiny and foreign relations: Examining the Nigeria-South Africa contradiction

Olumuyiwa Adebayo Adetunji, E. Adewumi
{"title":"Manifest destiny and foreign relations: Examining the Nigeria-South Africa contradiction","authors":"Olumuyiwa Adebayo Adetunji, E. Adewumi","doi":"10.5897/AJPSIR2020.1289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the dichotomy between potentials and capabilities with respect to Nigeria-South Africa relations and how this impinges on the leadership contest majorly involving the two countries. It observed that the international recognition accorded South Africa pitched it against Nigeria though, there are other contenders including Egypt, Algeria, Tunisia and Rwanda to mention a few for the leadership slot. To determine the leadership contest, this illustrative paper adopts descriptive and comparative methods to match the potentials vis-a-vis capabilities of Nigeria with South Africa in resolving the leadership contest. After a review of the foregoing issues, the study found out that though Nigeria was traditionally acknowledged as the giant of Africa, certain internal contradictions were not in tandem with Nigeria’s leadership status as it remained a country of potentials lacking the edge to provide leadership for the rest of the continent. It concludes that South Africa appeared to meet the criteria for leadership to a greater extent and as such should be considered as the leader of the continent though competition cannot be ruled out by other contenders. \n \n   \n \n Key words: Manifest potentials, strengths, leadership, foreign relations, leadership contest.","PeriodicalId":120632,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Political Science and International Relations","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Political Science and International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPSIR2020.1289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyses the dichotomy between potentials and capabilities with respect to Nigeria-South Africa relations and how this impinges on the leadership contest majorly involving the two countries. It observed that the international recognition accorded South Africa pitched it against Nigeria though, there are other contenders including Egypt, Algeria, Tunisia and Rwanda to mention a few for the leadership slot. To determine the leadership contest, this illustrative paper adopts descriptive and comparative methods to match the potentials vis-a-vis capabilities of Nigeria with South Africa in resolving the leadership contest. After a review of the foregoing issues, the study found out that though Nigeria was traditionally acknowledged as the giant of Africa, certain internal contradictions were not in tandem with Nigeria’s leadership status as it remained a country of potentials lacking the edge to provide leadership for the rest of the continent. It concludes that South Africa appeared to meet the criteria for leadership to a greater extent and as such should be considered as the leader of the continent though competition cannot be ruled out by other contenders.   Key words: Manifest potentials, strengths, leadership, foreign relations, leadership contest.
天定命运与对外关系:审视尼日利亚-南非矛盾
本文分析了尼日利亚-南非关系的潜力和能力之间的二分法,以及这对主要涉及两国的领导竞争的影响。它指出,国际社会对南非的认可使其与尼日利亚竞争,但还有其他竞争者,包括埃及、阿尔及利亚、突尼斯和卢旺达,仅举几例。为了确定领导力竞赛,本说明性论文采用描述性和比较性方法来匹配尼日利亚与南非在解决领导力竞赛方面的潜力。在对上述问题进行审查后,该研究发现,尽管尼日利亚传统上被认为是非洲巨人,但某些内部矛盾与尼日利亚的领导地位并不一致,因为它仍然是一个具有潜力的国家,缺乏为非洲大陆其他国家提供领导的优势。它的结论是,南非似乎在更大程度上符合领导的标准,因此应被视为非洲大陆的领导人,尽管不能排除其他竞争者的竞争。关键词:彰显潜能,优势,领导力,对外关系,领导力竞赛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书