The Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning Methods: A case study of writing learning at Junior High School

H. Juita, Sigit Widiyarto
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning Methods: A case study of writing learning at Junior High School","authors":"H. Juita, Sigit Widiyarto","doi":"10.2991/icollite-18.2019.58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning methods have an important role in the learning process of teaching. But there are still teachers who do not optimize the use of learning methods, so the classroom atmosphere is monotonous and boring, and learning to write procedure texts is still considered difficult by students. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the think pair share (TPS) and example and non-example methods. So need improvement. The methodology used is the one-group pretest-posttest design experiment. Before that, we test the data by normalitas and homogenitas. The data is normal and homogen The results showed that, the method of TPS and example non example can improve the learning outcomes of writing procedure text well. However, TPS method is better than example and non-example method. So that the teacher is expected to be able to use the methods well and effectively. Keywords—cooperative learning; teaching method; text procedure writing","PeriodicalId":236303,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Second Conference on Language, Literature, Education, and Culture (ICOLLITE 2018)","volume":"43 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Second Conference on Language, Literature, Education, and Culture (ICOLLITE 2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/icollite-18.2019.58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Learning methods have an important role in the learning process of teaching. But there are still teachers who do not optimize the use of learning methods, so the classroom atmosphere is monotonous and boring, and learning to write procedure texts is still considered difficult by students. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the think pair share (TPS) and example and non-example methods. So need improvement. The methodology used is the one-group pretest-posttest design experiment. Before that, we test the data by normalitas and homogenitas. The data is normal and homogen The results showed that, the method of TPS and example non example can improve the learning outcomes of writing procedure text well. However, TPS method is better than example and non-example method. So that the teacher is expected to be able to use the methods well and effectively. Keywords—cooperative learning; teaching method; text procedure writing
合作学习方法的有效性:以初中写作学习为例
学习方法在教学的学习过程中具有重要的作用。但仍有教师没有对学习方法的使用进行优化,课堂气氛单调乏味,学习编写程序文本仍被学生认为是困难的。本研究的目的是比较思维对分享(TPS)和实例与非实例方法的有效性。所以需要改进。本研究采用单组前测后测设计实验。在此之前,我们用正态性和均态性对数据进行检验。结果表明,TPS法和样例非样例法能较好地提高编写过程文本的学习效果。但TPS法优于实例法和非实例法。这样老师就能很好地有效地使用这些方法。Keywords-cooperative学习;教学方法;文本程序编写
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信