Integrated Design Thinking to Improve Pedagogical Practices in Creative Engineering Design

Jui-Hung Cheng
{"title":"Integrated Design Thinking to Improve Pedagogical Practices in Creative Engineering Design","authors":"Jui-Hung Cheng","doi":"10.35745/idc2022v01.01.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Repeated testing, revision, and verification make products have market value and the commercialization of creative ideas reflected in the product. In the model, product and industrial designs present actual cases so that students are trained from scratch to clarify problems, identify needs, establish functional structures, and evaluate the creative design and engineering design. A good design plan includes market and user demand analysis, creative thinking, concept formation, and actual prototype making. Thus, students need to learn how to simulate the actual product design and development process through design protection and complete design planning. Therefore, taking creative engineering design courses as an example, this study aims to introduce various design methods into interactive teaching by using the problem/project-based learning (PBL) and science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) model. In industry, the methods are expected to simulate how a product design engineer faces the market and consumers. The results reveal the following. Students prefer to focus on hands-on practice and ask for examples and supplementary reference materials and a diversified interactive learning model. They like to work in groups and interact with peers and teachers to learn in real-time, hoping to know their levels and thoughts. They hope to apply what they learn for future career development. The education model integrates academic theory and industrial practice to reduce the gap between learning and practice in the industry.","PeriodicalId":272767,"journal":{"name":"Innovation on Design and Culture","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation on Design and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35745/idc2022v01.01.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Repeated testing, revision, and verification make products have market value and the commercialization of creative ideas reflected in the product. In the model, product and industrial designs present actual cases so that students are trained from scratch to clarify problems, identify needs, establish functional structures, and evaluate the creative design and engineering design. A good design plan includes market and user demand analysis, creative thinking, concept formation, and actual prototype making. Thus, students need to learn how to simulate the actual product design and development process through design protection and complete design planning. Therefore, taking creative engineering design courses as an example, this study aims to introduce various design methods into interactive teaching by using the problem/project-based learning (PBL) and science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) model. In industry, the methods are expected to simulate how a product design engineer faces the market and consumers. The results reveal the following. Students prefer to focus on hands-on practice and ask for examples and supplementary reference materials and a diversified interactive learning model. They like to work in groups and interact with peers and teachers to learn in real-time, hoping to know their levels and thoughts. They hope to apply what they learn for future career development. The education model integrates academic theory and industrial practice to reduce the gap between learning and practice in the industry.
综合设计思维对创新工程设计教学实践的改进
反复测试、修改、验证,使产品具有市场价值,体现在产品上的创意商业化。在模型中,产品和工业设计呈现实际案例,培养学生从零开始澄清问题,识别需求,建立功能结构,评估创意设计和工程设计。一个好的设计方案包括市场和用户需求分析、创造性思维、概念形成和实际原型制作。因此,学生需要学习如何通过设计保护和完成设计规划来模拟实际的产品设计和开发过程。因此,本研究旨在以创意工程设计课程为例,运用基于问题/项目的学习(PBL)和科学、技术、工程、艺术和数学(STEAM)模型,将多种设计方法引入互动教学。在工业中,这些方法被期望模拟产品设计工程师如何面对市场和消费者。结果显示如下。学生更喜欢注重动手练习,要求举例和补充参考资料,以及多样化的互动学习模式。他们喜欢在小组中工作,与同伴和老师互动,实时学习,希望了解他们的水平和想法。他们希望将所学应用到未来的职业发展中。将学术理论与行业实践相结合的教育模式,减少了学习与行业实践之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书