A comparative study among swarming intelligence algorithms and subspace based algorithms for high resolution direction of arrival estimation

Nauman Ahmed, Sikandar Khan, Sajid Ali, Rizwan Ahmed, R. A. Rahman, Mamon M. Horoub, Hamid Khan, Sadaqat Ali
{"title":"A comparative study among swarming intelligence algorithms and subspace based algorithms for high resolution direction of arrival estimation","authors":"Nauman Ahmed, Sikandar Khan, Sajid Ali, Rizwan Ahmed, R. A. Rahman, Mamon M. Horoub, Hamid Khan, Sadaqat Ali","doi":"10.1109/ICEET56468.2022.10007297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent advances in underwater signal processing have enabled the parameter estimation of Direction of Arrival (DOA) utilizing evolutionary computing paradigms, which also has witnessed several applications in the field of seismology, earthquakes, astronomy, and biomedicine. In this work, an innovative study of comparison among state of the art subspace-based and particle swarm optimization (PSO) and Genetic Algorithms (GA) algorithms is presented to have effective DOA estimates for various objects with dynamical characteristics in underwater scenario. The viability of innovative statistical indices is employed to describe performance in order to evaluate it. The effectiveness of the GA and PSO a is evaluated in comparison with its traditional counterparts (such as MVDR, MVDR, MUSIC, ESPRIT and UESPRIT) based on different metrics such as estimation accuracy, probability of resolution and computational robustness against the number of elements and noise. For validation assessments, Crammer Rao Bound (CRB) analysis is also performed, and outcomes from Monte Carlo runs show that the Genetic Algorithm (GA) outperforms its analogue in terms of complexity indices, convergence, and precision.","PeriodicalId":241355,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Engineering and Emerging Technologies (ICEET)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Engineering and Emerging Technologies (ICEET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEET56468.2022.10007297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent advances in underwater signal processing have enabled the parameter estimation of Direction of Arrival (DOA) utilizing evolutionary computing paradigms, which also has witnessed several applications in the field of seismology, earthquakes, astronomy, and biomedicine. In this work, an innovative study of comparison among state of the art subspace-based and particle swarm optimization (PSO) and Genetic Algorithms (GA) algorithms is presented to have effective DOA estimates for various objects with dynamical characteristics in underwater scenario. The viability of innovative statistical indices is employed to describe performance in order to evaluate it. The effectiveness of the GA and PSO a is evaluated in comparison with its traditional counterparts (such as MVDR, MVDR, MUSIC, ESPRIT and UESPRIT) based on different metrics such as estimation accuracy, probability of resolution and computational robustness against the number of elements and noise. For validation assessments, Crammer Rao Bound (CRB) analysis is also performed, and outcomes from Monte Carlo runs show that the Genetic Algorithm (GA) outperforms its analogue in terms of complexity indices, convergence, and precision.
高分辨率到达方向估计的群智能算法与子空间算法的比较研究
水下信号处理的最新进展使得利用进化计算范式对到达方向(DOA)进行参数估计成为可能,并在地震学、地震学、天文学和生物医学等领域得到了广泛应用。在这项工作中,提出了一项创新的研究,将最先进的基于子空间的粒子群优化(PSO)和遗传算法(GA)进行比较,以对水下场景中具有动态特性的各种目标进行有效的DOA估计。采用创新统计指标的可行性来描述绩效,从而对绩效进行评价。基于不同的指标,如估计精度、分辨率概率和对元素数量和噪声的计算鲁棒性,将GA和PSO a与传统的同类(如MVDR、MVDR、MUSIC、ESPRIT和UESPRIT)进行比较,评估其有效性。为了验证评估,还进行了Crammer Rao Bound (CRB)分析,蒙特卡罗运行的结果表明,遗传算法(GA)在复杂性指数、收敛性和精度方面优于其模拟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信