SUGGESTIONS RELATED TO THE EVALUATION OF THE EXCEL COURSE AT COMPUTER EDUCATION AND INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES DEPARTMENTS

Duygu Mavi
{"title":"SUGGESTIONS RELATED TO THE EVALUATION OF THE EXCEL COURSE AT COMPUTER EDUCATION AND INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES DEPARTMENTS","authors":"Duygu Mavi","doi":"10.32955/NEUJE.V2I1.120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The practical application aspect is important for the Excel course included in the curriculum of the Computer Education and Instructional Technologies Department (CEIT). However, the approach adopted when it comes to evaluations and grading is one sided. This study takes the example of an Excel course offered at the Near East University Ataturk Faculty of Education CEIT department and evaluates it according to the Metfessel-Michael program evaluation model. This evaluation was conducted within the timeframe as stated in the schedule. The study used mixed methods research and the opinions of students, employees working in this field, teaching staff and various administrators were collected via questionnaire, observation forms and face to face interviews. Quantitatively the differences between the two classes were evaluated according to common criteria and the correlative technique was used. This study concludes that as the Excel course has a large practical component, a multifaceted evaluation method with practical examinations and in-class assignments at the computer would better evaluate the students’ achievements. This study also discovered a need for regulations that would allow the use of the results of practical Excel examinations as exam results.","PeriodicalId":274194,"journal":{"name":"Near East University Online Journal of Education","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Near East University Online Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32955/NEUJE.V2I1.120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The practical application aspect is important for the Excel course included in the curriculum of the Computer Education and Instructional Technologies Department (CEIT). However, the approach adopted when it comes to evaluations and grading is one sided. This study takes the example of an Excel course offered at the Near East University Ataturk Faculty of Education CEIT department and evaluates it according to the Metfessel-Michael program evaluation model. This evaluation was conducted within the timeframe as stated in the schedule. The study used mixed methods research and the opinions of students, employees working in this field, teaching staff and various administrators were collected via questionnaire, observation forms and face to face interviews. Quantitatively the differences between the two classes were evaluated according to common criteria and the correlative technique was used. This study concludes that as the Excel course has a large practical component, a multifaceted evaluation method with practical examinations and in-class assignments at the computer would better evaluate the students’ achievements. This study also discovered a need for regulations that would allow the use of the results of practical Excel examinations as exam results.
计算机教育与教学技术系优秀课程评价之建议
计算机教育与教学技术系(CEIT)课程中包含的Excel课程的实际应用方面非常重要。然而,在评价和评分方面所采用的方法是片面的。本研究以近东大学阿塔图尔克教育学院CEIT系开设的一门Excel课程为例,根据Metfessel-Michael项目评估模型对其进行评估。这项评估是在时间表规定的时间范围内进行的。本研究采用混合研究方法,通过问卷调查、观察表和面对面访谈的方式收集了学生、该领域的员工、教学人员和各种管理人员的意见。根据通用标准定量评价两类间的差异,并采用相关技术。本研究认为,由于Excel课程具有较大的实践性,因此采用结合实际考试和计算机课堂作业的多方面评价方法可以更好地评价学生的成绩。这项研究还发现,需要制定规定,允许使用实际Excel考试的结果作为考试成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信