{"title":"How significant will be the test cost share for 3D die-to-wafer stacked-ICs?","authors":"M. Taouil, S. Hamdioui, E. Marinissen","doi":"10.1109/DTIS.2011.5941432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several challenges must be overcome before high volume production of the 3D Stacked-ICs (3D-SIC) can be realized. A key challenge is to guarantee the required product quality at minimal overall cost. Testing, which is an integral part of 3D-IC manufacturing, should be performed in such way that its cost contribution is optimal. This paper investigates the impact of different test moments for pre-bond and post-bond stacks (resulting into different test flows) on the overall cost of die-to-wafer (D2W) 3D-SICs. The investigation is carried out for a wide range of die yields and stack sizes. Moreover, a breakdown of the cost into manufacturing, test and packaging costs offers a more detailed picture of the 3D overall cost. Our simulation results show that overall cost in D2W stacking strongly depends on the selected test flow; test flows with pre-bond and post-bond tests show a higher test cost share, but a significant reduction in the overall 3D-SIC cost. In addition, the cost breakdown for our reference process reveals that the manufacturing cost is most dominant (between 76% and 85%), followed by test (between 13% and 19%). Moreover, the results show that the share of test and packaging decreases as the manufacturing becomes mature and the yield increases, and that both manufacturing and test cost share increases, while the packaging cost share decreases for higher stack sizes.","PeriodicalId":409387,"journal":{"name":"2011 6th International Conference on Design & Technology of Integrated Systems in Nanoscale Era (DTIS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 6th International Conference on Design & Technology of Integrated Systems in Nanoscale Era (DTIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DTIS.2011.5941432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
Several challenges must be overcome before high volume production of the 3D Stacked-ICs (3D-SIC) can be realized. A key challenge is to guarantee the required product quality at minimal overall cost. Testing, which is an integral part of 3D-IC manufacturing, should be performed in such way that its cost contribution is optimal. This paper investigates the impact of different test moments for pre-bond and post-bond stacks (resulting into different test flows) on the overall cost of die-to-wafer (D2W) 3D-SICs. The investigation is carried out for a wide range of die yields and stack sizes. Moreover, a breakdown of the cost into manufacturing, test and packaging costs offers a more detailed picture of the 3D overall cost. Our simulation results show that overall cost in D2W stacking strongly depends on the selected test flow; test flows with pre-bond and post-bond tests show a higher test cost share, but a significant reduction in the overall 3D-SIC cost. In addition, the cost breakdown for our reference process reveals that the manufacturing cost is most dominant (between 76% and 85%), followed by test (between 13% and 19%). Moreover, the results show that the share of test and packaging decreases as the manufacturing becomes mature and the yield increases, and that both manufacturing and test cost share increases, while the packaging cost share decreases for higher stack sizes.
在实现3D堆叠集成电路(3D- sic)的大批量生产之前,必须克服几个挑战。一个关键的挑战是以最小的总成本保证所需的产品质量。测试是3D-IC制造的一个组成部分,应该以其成本贡献最优的方式进行。本文研究了粘合前和粘合后堆叠的不同测试力矩(导致不同的测试流程)对晶圆到晶圆(D2W) 3d - sic整体成本的影响。调查进行了广泛的模具产量和堆栈尺寸。此外,将成本分解为制造、测试和包装成本,可以更详细地了解3D总体成本。仿真结果表明,D2W叠加的总成本与所选择的测试流程有很大关系;粘合前和粘合后的测试流程显示出更高的测试成本份额,但总体3D-SIC成本显著降低。此外,我们参考过程的成本分解显示,制造成本是最主要的(在76%到85%之间),其次是测试成本(在13%到19%之间)。此外,测试和封装的份额随着制造成熟和产量的增加而减少,并且制造和测试成本份额都增加,而封装成本份额随着堆栈尺寸的增加而减少。