Empirical Study of the Public Acceptance Model of Indirect Tax Policy: The Underlying Guiding Principles of Good Tax Policy

Nur Erma Suryani Mohd Jamel, Nadiah Abd Hamid, Siti Noor Hayati Mohd Zawawi
{"title":"Empirical Study of the Public Acceptance Model of Indirect Tax Policy: The Underlying Guiding Principles of Good Tax Policy","authors":"Nur Erma Suryani Mohd Jamel, Nadiah Abd Hamid, Siti Noor Hayati Mohd Zawawi","doi":"10.35609/gcbssproceeding.2022.2(5)","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In view of the strong rumor that the Goods and Services Tax (GST) may be re-introduced in Malaysia, Bernama (2022) reported that Malaysia is keen on reintroducing GST to expand its revenue base and carry the weight of public subsidies. In fact, no country in the world has reverted from the Goods and Services Tax (GST) to the Sales and Services Tax (SST), except for Malaysia. Due to GST abolishment, Malaysia incurred an annual revenue loss of RM20 billion, and, surprisingly, the reintroduction of SST 2.0 did not contribute much to the government. Compared to the GST collection of RM41 billion in 2016 and RM44 billion in 2017, SST 2.0 only collected RM26.7 billion in 2020 and RM27.9 billion in 2021. Unfortunately, from the public's perspective, GST remains a very unpopular indirect tax reform due to its regressive nature, affecting both the poor and poor the rich. Since the tax applies to every transaction regardless of the socioeconomic status of individuals, it places an undue burden, especially on poor households. Similarly, the SST 2.0 also disappoints the public since it has the same features as SST 1.0, for instance, high tax evasion levels by businesses (Sanusi et al., 2015) and a cascading impact of sales tax whereby the tax incurred by manufacturers is re-taxed (tax-on-tax effect) to a certain extent at subsequent manufacturing process stages, thus increasing the prices of goods and services (Zhou et al., 2013). Besides, literature on the key catalyst of the public acceptance of Malaysian indirect tax also lacks discussions on a specific public acceptance model for indirect tax policy implementation. Since these unresolved problems could instigate another tragic rejection by the public and impact the government's revenue collection, this study, therefore, aims to bridge the gap by proposing an indirect tax acceptance model using the guiding principles of good tax policy recommended by AICPA (2017).\n\n\nKeywords: Goods and Services Tax (GST), Indirect Tax Policy, Good Tax Policy.","PeriodicalId":113523,"journal":{"name":"14th GCBSS Proceeding 2022","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"14th GCBSS Proceeding 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35609/gcbssproceeding.2022.2(5)","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In view of the strong rumor that the Goods and Services Tax (GST) may be re-introduced in Malaysia, Bernama (2022) reported that Malaysia is keen on reintroducing GST to expand its revenue base and carry the weight of public subsidies. In fact, no country in the world has reverted from the Goods and Services Tax (GST) to the Sales and Services Tax (SST), except for Malaysia. Due to GST abolishment, Malaysia incurred an annual revenue loss of RM20 billion, and, surprisingly, the reintroduction of SST 2.0 did not contribute much to the government. Compared to the GST collection of RM41 billion in 2016 and RM44 billion in 2017, SST 2.0 only collected RM26.7 billion in 2020 and RM27.9 billion in 2021. Unfortunately, from the public's perspective, GST remains a very unpopular indirect tax reform due to its regressive nature, affecting both the poor and poor the rich. Since the tax applies to every transaction regardless of the socioeconomic status of individuals, it places an undue burden, especially on poor households. Similarly, the SST 2.0 also disappoints the public since it has the same features as SST 1.0, for instance, high tax evasion levels by businesses (Sanusi et al., 2015) and a cascading impact of sales tax whereby the tax incurred by manufacturers is re-taxed (tax-on-tax effect) to a certain extent at subsequent manufacturing process stages, thus increasing the prices of goods and services (Zhou et al., 2013). Besides, literature on the key catalyst of the public acceptance of Malaysian indirect tax also lacks discussions on a specific public acceptance model for indirect tax policy implementation. Since these unresolved problems could instigate another tragic rejection by the public and impact the government's revenue collection, this study, therefore, aims to bridge the gap by proposing an indirect tax acceptance model using the guiding principles of good tax policy recommended by AICPA (2017). Keywords: Goods and Services Tax (GST), Indirect Tax Policy, Good Tax Policy.
间接税政策公众接受模型的实证研究:良好税收政策的基本指导原则
鉴于有关马来西亚可能重新引入商品及服务税(GST)的强烈传言,马新社(2022)报道,马来西亚热衷于重新引入商品及服务税,以扩大其收入基础并承担公共补贴的重量。事实上,除了马来西亚,世界上没有一个国家从商品及服务税(GST)转为销售及服务税(SST)。由于商品及服务税的废除,马来西亚每年损失了200亿令吉的收入,令人惊讶的是,重新引入SST 2.0并没有给政府带来太多贡献。与2016年的410亿令吉和2017年的440亿令吉相比,SST 2.0在2020年和2021年仅征收267亿令吉和279亿令吉。不幸的是,从公众的角度来看,商品及服务税仍然是一个非常不受欢迎的间接税改革,因为它的累退性质,影响穷人和穷人的富人。由于税收适用于每笔交易,而不考虑个人的社会经济地位,因此它造成了不应有的负担,特别是对贫困家庭。同样,SST 2.0也令公众失望,因为它具有与SST 1.0相同的特征,例如企业的高逃税水平(Sanusi et al., 2015)以及销售税的级联影响,即制造商产生的税收在随后的制造过程阶段在一定程度上重新征税(税对税效应),从而提高了商品和服务的价格(周等人,2013)。此外,关于马来西亚间接税公众接受的关键催化剂的文献也缺乏对间接税政策实施的具体公众接受模型的讨论。由于这些未解决的问题可能会引发公众的另一次悲剧性拒绝,并影响政府的税收征收,因此,本研究旨在通过使用AICPA(2017)推荐的良好税收政策指导原则,提出间接税接受模型来弥合差距。关键词:商品服务税,间接税政策,良好的税收政策
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信