A Survey of Interdisciplinary Geography Study Abroad Opportunities

C. J. Whitesides, Dominique Cagalanan, Hannah Graham, A. Hall, Reanna Kuiken, Thomas J. McCullough, B. Rogers
{"title":"A Survey of Interdisciplinary Geography Study Abroad Opportunities","authors":"C. J. Whitesides, Dominique Cagalanan, Hannah Graham, A. Hall, Reanna Kuiken, Thomas J. McCullough, B. Rogers","doi":"10.1080/19338341.2021.1931920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For decades, internationalization of the curriculum has been championed to prepare students for success in a globalized world (Harari 1981; Leask 2015; Mestenhauser and Ellingboe 1998). Internationalizing the curriculum also adds clout to educational institutions and keeps them competitive (Clifford and Montgomery 2011; Harris 2008), and many institutions have developed internationalization plans (Childress 2009). Study abroad is an obvious platform to accomplish these objectives. The number of US students studying abroad has increased from fewer than 100,000 students in the 1993–1994 academic year to nearly 350,000 in 2017–2018 (IIE 2019), and evidence suggests that students who participate in study abroad outperform those who do not (Houser et al. 2011). Study abroad is a type of fieldwork that has long been recognized and valued as an integral part of geography higher education (Mathewson 2001). Modern geographers like Alexander von Humboldt and Friedrich Ratzel spent much time researching abroad and established international study as germane to the discipline. Geography study abroad is more than “simply a marketing tool or an academic tourist excursion, [because] doing fieldwork in unfamiliar places and cultures offers a rich opportunity to disrupt student expectations, and to stimulate critical reflection on geographical practice in our students” (McGuinness and Simm 2005, 242). Since study abroad combines regional studies and fieldwork, both of which are foundational to geography, the discipline is well equipped to lead the internationalization of American universities (Pandit 2009), and it has been argued that geographers do study abroad better than others (Keese 2013). A special issue of Journal of Geography (Veeck and Biles 2009) and a symposium in Journal of Geography in Higher Education (Simm and Marvell 2017, 468) provide additional evidence that geography is “already internationalized and lends itself more easily to internationalizing the curriculum than many subjects and so should be well placed to address the needs of employers and societal needs for global citizens.” Internationalized curricula also foster interdisciplinarity (Childress 2009), and interdisciplinary learning opportunities enable students to “understand and make connections across a diverse array of knowledge and skills” resulting in “more rewarding lives and employment opportunities” (Bear and Skorton 2019, 60). As disciplines across the natural and social sciences and humanities tackle global grand challenges, such as those related to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals, interdisciplinarity in education is increasingly important (Annan-Diab and Molinari 2017; Clark and Wallace 2015; Parker 2010) and requires institutional support (Holley 2009). Geography’s topical and methodological breadth, for which it has long struggled to obtain recognition of its disciplinary niche (Turner 2002), is in fact a unique asset that results in interdisciplinary collaboration potential with departments from virtually all colleges across a given campus.","PeriodicalId":182364,"journal":{"name":"The Geography Teacher","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Geography Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19338341.2021.1931920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

For decades, internationalization of the curriculum has been championed to prepare students for success in a globalized world (Harari 1981; Leask 2015; Mestenhauser and Ellingboe 1998). Internationalizing the curriculum also adds clout to educational institutions and keeps them competitive (Clifford and Montgomery 2011; Harris 2008), and many institutions have developed internationalization plans (Childress 2009). Study abroad is an obvious platform to accomplish these objectives. The number of US students studying abroad has increased from fewer than 100,000 students in the 1993–1994 academic year to nearly 350,000 in 2017–2018 (IIE 2019), and evidence suggests that students who participate in study abroad outperform those who do not (Houser et al. 2011). Study abroad is a type of fieldwork that has long been recognized and valued as an integral part of geography higher education (Mathewson 2001). Modern geographers like Alexander von Humboldt and Friedrich Ratzel spent much time researching abroad and established international study as germane to the discipline. Geography study abroad is more than “simply a marketing tool or an academic tourist excursion, [because] doing fieldwork in unfamiliar places and cultures offers a rich opportunity to disrupt student expectations, and to stimulate critical reflection on geographical practice in our students” (McGuinness and Simm 2005, 242). Since study abroad combines regional studies and fieldwork, both of which are foundational to geography, the discipline is well equipped to lead the internationalization of American universities (Pandit 2009), and it has been argued that geographers do study abroad better than others (Keese 2013). A special issue of Journal of Geography (Veeck and Biles 2009) and a symposium in Journal of Geography in Higher Education (Simm and Marvell 2017, 468) provide additional evidence that geography is “already internationalized and lends itself more easily to internationalizing the curriculum than many subjects and so should be well placed to address the needs of employers and societal needs for global citizens.” Internationalized curricula also foster interdisciplinarity (Childress 2009), and interdisciplinary learning opportunities enable students to “understand and make connections across a diverse array of knowledge and skills” resulting in “more rewarding lives and employment opportunities” (Bear and Skorton 2019, 60). As disciplines across the natural and social sciences and humanities tackle global grand challenges, such as those related to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals, interdisciplinarity in education is increasingly important (Annan-Diab and Molinari 2017; Clark and Wallace 2015; Parker 2010) and requires institutional support (Holley 2009). Geography’s topical and methodological breadth, for which it has long struggled to obtain recognition of its disciplinary niche (Turner 2002), is in fact a unique asset that results in interdisciplinary collaboration potential with departments from virtually all colleges across a given campus.
跨学科地理出国留学机会调查
几十年来,课程的国际化一直受到推崇,以帮助学生为在全球化的世界中取得成功做好准备(Harari 1981;Leask 2015;Mestenhauser and Ellingboe 1998)。课程的国际化也增加了教育机构的影响力,使其保持竞争力(Clifford and Montgomery 2011;Harris 2008),许多机构已经制定了国际化计划(Childress 2009)。留学显然是实现这些目标的一个平台。在国外学习的美国学生人数从1993-1994学年的不到10万人增加到2017-2018学年的近35万人(IIE 2019),有证据表明,参加海外学习的学生比没有参加海外学习的学生表现更好(Houser et al. 2011)。出国留学是一种实地考察,长期以来一直被认为是高等地理教育的一个组成部分(Mathewson 2001)。现代地理学家如洪堡(Alexander von Humboldt)和拉策尔(Friedrich Ratzel)花了大量时间在国外进行研究,并建立了与该学科密切相关的国际研究。出国地理学习不仅仅是“简单的营销工具或学术旅游游览,[因为]在不熟悉的地方和文化进行实地考察提供了丰富的机会,可以打破学生的期望,并激发学生对地理实践的批判性反思”(McGuinness and Simm 2005,242)。由于出国留学结合了区域研究和实地考察,这两者都是地理学的基础,因此该学科完全有能力引领美国大学的国际化(Pandit 2009),并且有人认为地理学家出国留学比其他人做得更好(Keese 2013)。《地理杂志》(Veeck and Biles, 2009)的一期特刊和《高等教育地理杂志》(Simm and Marvell, 2017, 468)的一次专题讨论会提供了额外的证据,证明地理“已经国际化,并且比许多学科更容易使课程国际化,因此应该很好地满足雇主的需求和全球公民的社会需求。”国际化的课程也促进了跨学科(Childress 2009),跨学科的学习机会使学生能够“理解并建立各种知识和技能之间的联系”,从而带来“更有意义的生活和就业机会”(Bear and Skorton 2019, 60)。随着自然科学、社会科学和人文学科应对全球重大挑战,例如与实现可持续发展目标有关的挑战,教育领域的跨学科性变得越来越重要(Annan-Diab和Molinari, 2017;Clark and Wallace 2015;Parker 2010),并需要机构支持(Holley 2009)。地理学的主题和方法论的广度,长期以来一直在努力获得对其学科利基的认可(Turner 2002),实际上是一项独特的资产,它导致了与特定校园内几乎所有学院的院系的跨学科合作潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信