Analysis and comparison of spinal pain in office and physical workers

Karolina Idczak, W. Tomaszewski
{"title":"Analysis and comparison of spinal pain in office and physical workers","authors":"Karolina Idczak, W. Tomaszewski","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0014.8689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The aim of the study was the analysis and comparison of spinal pain symptoms between office workers and physical workers. Material and methods. The sample included 60 subjects. The participants were divided into two groups according to the type of work performed. The first group included office workers (30 people) and the second one included physical workers (30 persons). The study was carried out using a questionnaire. It was standardized and anonymous and included 23 questions. The study sample comprised the total of 60 surveys. The collected data were next subjected to statistical analysis. Results. It was found that office workers more often experienced pain in the cervical spine while the physical workers more often suffer from lumbar pain. In both groups the level of pain was similar in participants with a similar length of service. The study has found that physical activity does not contribute to back pain alleviation. Conclusions. 1. There are significant differences in back pain symptoms between the studied groups of physical and office workers. 2. In both groups the patients reported suffering from pain during and after work. 3. Both groups reported that spinal pain made it harder for them to perform everyday activities and occupational duties and that the type of job had the greatest impact on pain.\n\n","PeriodicalId":174963,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.8689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. The aim of the study was the analysis and comparison of spinal pain symptoms between office workers and physical workers. Material and methods. The sample included 60 subjects. The participants were divided into two groups according to the type of work performed. The first group included office workers (30 people) and the second one included physical workers (30 persons). The study was carried out using a questionnaire. It was standardized and anonymous and included 23 questions. The study sample comprised the total of 60 surveys. The collected data were next subjected to statistical analysis. Results. It was found that office workers more often experienced pain in the cervical spine while the physical workers more often suffer from lumbar pain. In both groups the level of pain was similar in participants with a similar length of service. The study has found that physical activity does not contribute to back pain alleviation. Conclusions. 1. There are significant differences in back pain symptoms between the studied groups of physical and office workers. 2. In both groups the patients reported suffering from pain during and after work. 3. Both groups reported that spinal pain made it harder for them to perform everyday activities and occupational duties and that the type of job had the greatest impact on pain.
办公室与体力劳动者脊柱疼痛的分析与比较
背景。这项研究的目的是分析和比较办公室工作者和体力劳动者之间的脊柱疼痛症状。材料和方法。样本包括60名受试者。参与者根据所从事的工作类型分为两组。第一组是上班族(30人),第二组是体力劳动者(30人)。这项研究是通过问卷调查进行的。它是标准化和匿名的,包括23个问题。研究样本共包括60份调查。然后对收集到的数据进行统计分析。结果。研究发现,上班族更常经历颈椎疼痛,而体力劳动者更常遭受腰椎疼痛。在两组中,服役时间相似的参与者的疼痛程度相似。研究发现,体育锻炼并不能缓解背痛。结论:1。在被研究的体力工作者和办公室工作者之间,背痛症状有显著差异。2. 两组患者都报告在工作期间和工作后感到疼痛。3.两组人都报告说,脊柱疼痛使他们更难进行日常活动和职业职责,而工作类型对疼痛的影响最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信