Assessing the Allocation of Italian Foreign Aid

Claudia Maurini, Riccardo Settimo
{"title":"Assessing the Allocation of Italian Foreign Aid","authors":"Claudia Maurini, Riccardo Settimo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1479512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides an assessment of Italian aid policy during the period 1983-2006. In comparison with other donors (DAC and G-7), the main stylized facts are: persistently lower aid/GDP ratio, greater recourse to multilateral channels, a higher percentage of i?½tiedi?½ flows and relatively greater recourse to debt relief. Drawing on the empirical literature on aid allocation, we estimate the determinants of Italyi?½s bilateral aid. We use three groups of explanatory variables, reflecting national-interest, humanitarian and selectivity-related motivations. We find that the distribution of Italian bilateral resources is significantly affected by both national-interest (like foreign policy or trade) and humanitarian motives, related to recipientsi?½ needs; the latteri?½s role, in particular, seems to have strengthened over time. There is ample room for improving selectivity, i.e., the capacity to direct ODA flows to i?½deservingi?½ countries, where better policies and institutions are likely to increase aid effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":309442,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Foreign Aid (Topic)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Foreign Aid (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1479512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This paper provides an assessment of Italian aid policy during the period 1983-2006. In comparison with other donors (DAC and G-7), the main stylized facts are: persistently lower aid/GDP ratio, greater recourse to multilateral channels, a higher percentage of i?½tiedi?½ flows and relatively greater recourse to debt relief. Drawing on the empirical literature on aid allocation, we estimate the determinants of Italyi?½s bilateral aid. We use three groups of explanatory variables, reflecting national-interest, humanitarian and selectivity-related motivations. We find that the distribution of Italian bilateral resources is significantly affected by both national-interest (like foreign policy or trade) and humanitarian motives, related to recipientsi?½ needs; the latteri?½s role, in particular, seems to have strengthened over time. There is ample room for improving selectivity, i.e., the capacity to direct ODA flows to i?½deservingi?½ countries, where better policies and institutions are likely to increase aid effectiveness.
评估意大利对外援助的分配
本文对意大利在1983-2006年期间的援助政策进行了评估。与其他捐助国(发展援助委员会和七国集团)相比,主要的程式化事实是:援助/国内生产总值比率持续较低,更多地求助于多边渠道,援助的百分比较高。一半的资金流和相对更大的债务减免。根据有关援助分配的实证文献,我们估计了意大利经济增长的决定因素。这是双边援助。我们使用三组解释变量,反映国家利益、人道主义和选择性相关动机。我们发现,意大利双边资源的分配受到国家利益(如外交政策或贸易)和人道主义动机(与受援国有关)的显著影响。½需求;latteri吗?尤其是,随着时间的推移,苹果的作用似乎越来越强。有很大的余地可以改进选择性,即将官方发展援助流量引导到需要的地方的能力。在这些国家,更好的政策和制度可能会提高援助的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信