Transparency and Public Information on the Internet: Investigating Accountability in the Legislative and Judicial Branches in the South American Scenario

Júlio César Andrade de Abreu, Antonio João Vianna Junior, Elen Reis
{"title":"Transparency and Public Information on the Internet: Investigating Accountability in the Legislative and Judicial Branches in the South American Scenario","authors":"Júlio César Andrade de Abreu, Antonio João Vianna Junior, Elen Reis","doi":"10.1109/ICEDEG.2019.8734436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the face of the uninterrupted advancement of information and communication technology (ICT)tools, public sectors are getting closer and closer to citizens. Accordingly, web portals have become an important instrument in enabling society to acquire public information. Therefore, this article seeks to present an overview of the accountability of legislative and judicial branches as indicated by the official websites of national parliaments and courts of the Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR)countries. The methodology used was based on an observation protocol that considered the indicators proposed by the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU)for the legislative branch and by Porto [1] for the judiciary. In conclusion, a significant superiority was observed in Brazil regarding the presence of accountability dimensions in both parliaments and courts of justice. Although Argentina performed reasonably well in its legislative branch, the Argentine Supreme Court of Justice website required substantial improvements. In contrast, Paraguay and Uruguay showed a greater need to increase the availability of information on their web portals, both for their legislative and judicial branches. The research also indicates an opportunity for greater interaction between the selected countries, in an effort to share good transparency and accessibility practices on public data.","PeriodicalId":147979,"journal":{"name":"2019 Sixth International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Sixth International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG.2019.8734436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the face of the uninterrupted advancement of information and communication technology (ICT)tools, public sectors are getting closer and closer to citizens. Accordingly, web portals have become an important instrument in enabling society to acquire public information. Therefore, this article seeks to present an overview of the accountability of legislative and judicial branches as indicated by the official websites of national parliaments and courts of the Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR)countries. The methodology used was based on an observation protocol that considered the indicators proposed by the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU)for the legislative branch and by Porto [1] for the judiciary. In conclusion, a significant superiority was observed in Brazil regarding the presence of accountability dimensions in both parliaments and courts of justice. Although Argentina performed reasonably well in its legislative branch, the Argentine Supreme Court of Justice website required substantial improvements. In contrast, Paraguay and Uruguay showed a greater need to increase the availability of information on their web portals, both for their legislative and judicial branches. The research also indicates an opportunity for greater interaction between the selected countries, in an effort to share good transparency and accessibility practices on public data.
互联网上的透明度和公共信息:调查南美情况下立法和司法部门的问责制
面对信息通信技术(ICT)工具的不断进步,公共部门与公民的距离越来越近。因此,门户网站已成为社会获取公共信息的重要工具。因此,本文旨在概述南方共同市场(MERCOSUR)国家议会和法院的官方网站所显示的立法和司法部门的问责制。所使用的方法基于一项观察议定书,该议定书考虑了各国议会联盟(IPU)为立法部门提出的指标和波尔图[1]为司法部门提出的指标。最后,在议会和法院都设有问责制方面,巴西有明显的优势。虽然阿根廷在立法部门的表现相当不错,但阿根廷最高法院的网站需要大量改进。相反,巴拉圭和乌拉圭表现出更大的需要,增加其立法和司法部门在其门户网站上提供的资料。该研究还表明,在所选国家之间有机会加强互动,以努力分享有关公共数据的良好透明度和可访问性做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书