Evaluation of Common Antimicrobials against Clinical Isolates: An In Vitro Study

Ayesha Esrat, Palash Mia, T. Zerin, Md Ifrat Hossain, Shekha Nita Mondal
{"title":"Evaluation of Common Antimicrobials against Clinical Isolates: An In Vitro Study","authors":"Ayesha Esrat, Palash Mia, T. Zerin, Md Ifrat Hossain, Shekha Nita Mondal","doi":"10.47631/jsrmbs.v3i3.552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: In this era of COVID-19, one of the most effective protective measures to prevent respiratory diseases is maintaining hand hygiene. Moreover, the use of hand sanitizer, hand wash, antiseptics, and disinfectants increased abruptly in this outbreak. \nMaterials & Methods: An in vitro antimicrobial potential of twelve antimicrobials were chosen for this study. They were tested for their antibacterial activity using disk diffusion and agar well diffusion methods against eleven clinical isolates from urine, wounds, tracheal aspirate, and sputum. \nResults: Clinical isolates were presumptively identified using standard microbiological procedures as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella sp., Staphylococcus aureus, Acinetobacter sp., and Streptococcus sp. Among all the antimicrobials, Savlon (family size) antiseptic disinfectant showed the highest zone of inhibition (ZOIs) against most of the bacterial isolates, followed by hand sanitizer Hexisol. Whereas, the least antimicrobial activity was observed by Savlon hand wash, Germ Kill hand sanitizer, and Dabur hand sanitizer among all the tested products. \nConclusions: The variability in performance of those twelve products against bacterial pathogens revealed an urge to validate the antibacterial activity of antimicrobials and systematic monitoring of their effectiveness and uniformity in activity against pathogenic microbes.","PeriodicalId":422270,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scientific Research in Medical and Biological Sciences","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scientific Research in Medical and Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47631/jsrmbs.v3i3.552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In this era of COVID-19, one of the most effective protective measures to prevent respiratory diseases is maintaining hand hygiene. Moreover, the use of hand sanitizer, hand wash, antiseptics, and disinfectants increased abruptly in this outbreak. Materials & Methods: An in vitro antimicrobial potential of twelve antimicrobials were chosen for this study. They were tested for their antibacterial activity using disk diffusion and agar well diffusion methods against eleven clinical isolates from urine, wounds, tracheal aspirate, and sputum. Results: Clinical isolates were presumptively identified using standard microbiological procedures as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella sp., Staphylococcus aureus, Acinetobacter sp., and Streptococcus sp. Among all the antimicrobials, Savlon (family size) antiseptic disinfectant showed the highest zone of inhibition (ZOIs) against most of the bacterial isolates, followed by hand sanitizer Hexisol. Whereas, the least antimicrobial activity was observed by Savlon hand wash, Germ Kill hand sanitizer, and Dabur hand sanitizer among all the tested products. Conclusions: The variability in performance of those twelve products against bacterial pathogens revealed an urge to validate the antibacterial activity of antimicrobials and systematic monitoring of their effectiveness and uniformity in activity against pathogenic microbes.
常用抗菌药物对临床分离株的体外研究
目的:在COVID-19时代,保持手部卫生是预防呼吸道疾病最有效的防护措施之一。此外,在这次疫情中,洗手液、洗手液、防腐剂和消毒剂的使用急剧增加。材料与方法:选择12种抗菌药物进行体外抗菌潜力研究。采用纸片扩散法和琼脂孔扩散法对11种临床分离株进行抑菌活性测试,这些分离株来自尿液、伤口、气管吸出液和痰液。结果:采用标准微生物学方法推定临床分离菌株为大肠杆菌、克雷伯氏菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、不动杆菌和链球菌。在所有抗菌药物中,Savlon(家族大小)抗菌消毒液对大多数细菌的抑制区(ZOIs)最高,其次是洗手液Hexisol。而Savlon洗手液、Germ Kill洗手液和Dabur洗手液的抗菌活性最低。结论:这12种产品对细菌病原菌的性能差异表明,迫切需要验证抗菌药物的抗菌活性,并对其对病原菌活性的有效性和一致性进行系统监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信