The Influence of Verse on Cognitive Processes: A Psycholinguistic Experiment

Tatyana Skulacheva, N. Slioussar, Alexander Kostyuk, Anna Lipina, Emil Latypov, Varvara Koroleva
{"title":"The Influence of Verse on Cognitive Processes: A Psycholinguistic Experiment","authors":"Tatyana Skulacheva, N. Slioussar, Alexander Kostyuk, Anna Lipina, Emil Latypov, Varvara Koroleva","doi":"10.51305/icl.cz.9788076580336.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern psycho- and neurolinguistics use standards of precision typical of the natural sciences. As verse scholarship also bases its standards on those of the natural sciences, it can be combined fruitfully with the natural sciences, including neuroscience. This may ultimately allow us to answer the fundamental question of how verse and prose are processed in the brain. In this paper, we present the preliminary results of our project that aims to uncover how verse’s effects on cognitive processes compare to those of prose. We conducted 3 experiments with 110 informants who were native speakers of Russian between 18 and 55 years old. These experiments had the same design but involved different stimulus texts and groups of informants (40+40+30). Informants are known to slow down their reading considerably if they detect a textual error. Our aim was to compare the reading times for different verse and prose fragments when they contained errors and when they were error-free. We found that errors in verse remain undetected while the same errors are easily perceived in a corresponding prose text. The observation of this phenomenon in all three experiments is important proof of its validity. We suggest that prose and verse differently activate two ways of processing information in the brain: the first way is logical and relies on critical thinking including error detection, while the second is associative and depends on mental imagery rather than sequential logic","PeriodicalId":351590,"journal":{"name":"Tackling the Toolkit: Plotting Poetry through Computational Literary Studies","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tackling the Toolkit: Plotting Poetry through Computational Literary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51305/icl.cz.9788076580336.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modern psycho- and neurolinguistics use standards of precision typical of the natural sciences. As verse scholarship also bases its standards on those of the natural sciences, it can be combined fruitfully with the natural sciences, including neuroscience. This may ultimately allow us to answer the fundamental question of how verse and prose are processed in the brain. In this paper, we present the preliminary results of our project that aims to uncover how verse’s effects on cognitive processes compare to those of prose. We conducted 3 experiments with 110 informants who were native speakers of Russian between 18 and 55 years old. These experiments had the same design but involved different stimulus texts and groups of informants (40+40+30). Informants are known to slow down their reading considerably if they detect a textual error. Our aim was to compare the reading times for different verse and prose fragments when they contained errors and when they were error-free. We found that errors in verse remain undetected while the same errors are easily perceived in a corresponding prose text. The observation of this phenomenon in all three experiments is important proof of its validity. We suggest that prose and verse differently activate two ways of processing information in the brain: the first way is logical and relies on critical thinking including error detection, while the second is associative and depends on mental imagery rather than sequential logic
诗歌对认知过程的影响:一项心理语言学实验
现代心理学和神经语言学使用的是典型的自然科学的精确标准。由于诗歌学术也以自然科学的标准为基础,因此它可以与包括神经科学在内的自然科学相结合。这可能最终使我们能够回答诗歌和散文是如何在大脑中处理的基本问题。在本文中,我们介绍了我们项目的初步结果,旨在揭示诗歌对认知过程的影响与散文的影响相比。我们对110名以俄语为母语、年龄在18到55岁之间的人进行了3次实验。这些实验具有相同的设计,但涉及不同的刺激文本和信息者组(40+40+30)。众所周知,如果发现文本错误,举报人会大大放慢阅读速度。我们的目的是比较不同的诗歌和散文片段在有错误和没有错误的情况下的阅读时间。我们发现,诗歌中的错误不容易被发现,而同样的错误在相应的散文文本中很容易被发现。在所有三个实验中观察到的这一现象是其有效性的重要证据。我们认为,散文和诗歌不同地激活了大脑中处理信息的两种方式:第一种方式是逻辑的,依赖于包括错误检测在内的批判性思维;第二种方式是联想的,依赖于心理意象而不是顺序逻辑
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信