‘Global Warming’ and the Energy Transition (Foreign Trade Aspect)

I. Korolev
{"title":"‘Global Warming’ and the Energy Transition (Foreign Trade Aspect)","authors":"I. Korolev","doi":"10.20542/afij-2022-2-13-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Last 10‒15 years ‘global warming’ is presented as the main threat to humanity, allegedly more dangerous than a possible nuclear catastrophe. To counteract ‘climate change’ an energy transit mechanism has been launched on national and international levels. Among its aims ‒ phasing out traditional energy resources, reducing output of other products with an intensive carbon emission, forced despite the costs, transition to renewable energy resources. To achieve these aims a lot of measures are examined including EU possible applying the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism which may be interpreted as a trade war instrument. Many such measures contradict the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (1992) the aims of which were formulated as to avoid dangers for production and sustainable growth especially for developing countries. One-sided energy transition may destabilize the situation at world markets and destroy international trade system based on WTO principles. Possible counteractions of Russia should be determined first of all by the aims of supporting its competiveness. This implies in particular the use of traditional energy resources (oil, gas, coal) in Russian economy as long as possible. Critical attitude to the prevailing international climate agenda does not mean that the author underestimates the importance of environmental issues for Russia. The close-down of many factories after the collapse of the Soviet Union diminished pollution in some places. But new dangers have appeared ‒ privately owned vehicles, urban solid waste, abandoned farmersʹ lands, ill-conceived and even criminal lodging construction. Speaking of numerous environmental and biodiversity metrics, our country fails to keep pace with advanced standarts. Even under Western sanctions Russia should increase financial outlets in order to improve environmental situation in the country. More effective ecological laws are badly needed not only in industry and transport but also in regional and municipal development.","PeriodicalId":405984,"journal":{"name":"Analysis and Forecasting. IMEMO Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analysis and Forecasting. IMEMO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20542/afij-2022-2-13-22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Last 10‒15 years ‘global warming’ is presented as the main threat to humanity, allegedly more dangerous than a possible nuclear catastrophe. To counteract ‘climate change’ an energy transit mechanism has been launched on national and international levels. Among its aims ‒ phasing out traditional energy resources, reducing output of other products with an intensive carbon emission, forced despite the costs, transition to renewable energy resources. To achieve these aims a lot of measures are examined including EU possible applying the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism which may be interpreted as a trade war instrument. Many such measures contradict the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (1992) the aims of which were formulated as to avoid dangers for production and sustainable growth especially for developing countries. One-sided energy transition may destabilize the situation at world markets and destroy international trade system based on WTO principles. Possible counteractions of Russia should be determined first of all by the aims of supporting its competiveness. This implies in particular the use of traditional energy resources (oil, gas, coal) in Russian economy as long as possible. Critical attitude to the prevailing international climate agenda does not mean that the author underestimates the importance of environmental issues for Russia. The close-down of many factories after the collapse of the Soviet Union diminished pollution in some places. But new dangers have appeared ‒ privately owned vehicles, urban solid waste, abandoned farmersʹ lands, ill-conceived and even criminal lodging construction. Speaking of numerous environmental and biodiversity metrics, our country fails to keep pace with advanced standarts. Even under Western sanctions Russia should increase financial outlets in order to improve environmental situation in the country. More effective ecological laws are badly needed not only in industry and transport but also in regional and municipal development.
“全球变暖”与能源转型(对外贸易方面)
过去10-15年,“全球变暖”被认为是对人类的主要威胁,据称比可能发生的核灾难更危险。为应对“气候变化”,在国家和国际层面启动了能源过境机制。它的目标之一是逐步淘汰传统能源,减少其他高碳排放产品的产量,尽管成本高昂,但必须向可再生能源过渡。为了实现这些目标,研究了许多措施,包括欧盟可能采用的碳边界调整机制,这可能被解释为一种贸易战工具。许多这类措施与《联合国气候变化框架公约》(1992年)相抵触,该公约制定的目的是避免对生产和可持续增长造成危险,特别是对发展中国家。片面的能源转型可能破坏世界市场的稳定,破坏以世贸组织原则为基础的国际贸易体系。俄罗斯可能采取的反制措施,首先应以支持其竞争力为目标。这尤其意味着在俄罗斯经济中尽可能长时间地使用传统能源(石油、天然气、煤炭)。对当前国际气候议程的批判态度并不意味着作者低估了环境问题对俄罗斯的重要性。苏联解体后许多工厂的关闭减少了一些地方的污染。但是新的危险已经出现——私人拥有的车辆、城市固体废物、被遗弃的农民土地、考虑不周全甚至是犯罪的住房建设。谈到众多的环境和生物多样性指标,我国未能跟上先进标准的步伐。即使在西方的制裁下,俄罗斯也应该增加金融渠道,以改善该国的环境状况。不仅在工业和交通领域,而且在区域和城市发展中,都迫切需要更有效的生态法律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信