Gerd Gigerenzer and Vernon Smith: Ecological Rationality of Heuristics in Psychology and Economics

S. Mousavi
{"title":"Gerd Gigerenzer and Vernon Smith: Ecological Rationality of Heuristics in Psychology and Economics","authors":"S. Mousavi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3457191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Behavioral economists use psychological findings to evaluate and revise economic decision theory, to build models that correspond directly to observations of behavior, and to develop descriptive accounts for deviations from principles of neoclassical rationality. One of the main sources of psychological insight is the heuristics and biases research program. This chapter introduces another source of psychological insights, the ecological rationality of fast-and-frugal heuristics, and is organized as follows. First, the chapter juxtaposes psychological (á la Gigerenzer) with economic (á la Smith) views of ecological rationality, thereby connecting fast-and-frugal heuristics to a major source of inspiration and motivation for behavioral economists, namely experimental economics. Then, it briefly reviews a collection of articles illustrating how the successful use of heuristics in business decision making can be understood by using ecological rationality as an investigative framework. Finally, it locates the field of inquiry for behavioral economics on a continuum of scientific problem solving in the interval that Weaver (1948) called organized complexity. Simple heuristics deserve special attention from behavioral economists because they work best in this very interval where exact methods of optimization are structurally unfitting. Put together, these connections, examples, and arguments suggest that mainstream behavioral economics can gain from integrating this less-explored psychological framework. This integration starts by attempting to formulate effective decision rules as fast-and-frugal heuristics and exploring their ecological rationality.","PeriodicalId":143310,"journal":{"name":"DecisionSciRN: Other Economic Decision Theory (Sub-Topic)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DecisionSciRN: Other Economic Decision Theory (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3457191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Behavioral economists use psychological findings to evaluate and revise economic decision theory, to build models that correspond directly to observations of behavior, and to develop descriptive accounts for deviations from principles of neoclassical rationality. One of the main sources of psychological insight is the heuristics and biases research program. This chapter introduces another source of psychological insights, the ecological rationality of fast-and-frugal heuristics, and is organized as follows. First, the chapter juxtaposes psychological (á la Gigerenzer) with economic (á la Smith) views of ecological rationality, thereby connecting fast-and-frugal heuristics to a major source of inspiration and motivation for behavioral economists, namely experimental economics. Then, it briefly reviews a collection of articles illustrating how the successful use of heuristics in business decision making can be understood by using ecological rationality as an investigative framework. Finally, it locates the field of inquiry for behavioral economics on a continuum of scientific problem solving in the interval that Weaver (1948) called organized complexity. Simple heuristics deserve special attention from behavioral economists because they work best in this very interval where exact methods of optimization are structurally unfitting. Put together, these connections, examples, and arguments suggest that mainstream behavioral economics can gain from integrating this less-explored psychological framework. This integration starts by attempting to formulate effective decision rules as fast-and-frugal heuristics and exploring their ecological rationality.
Gerd Gigerenzer和Vernon Smith:心理学和经济学中启发式的生态合理性
行为经济学家利用心理学的发现来评估和修正经济决策理论,建立直接与行为观察相对应的模型,并对偏离新古典理性原则的行为进行描述性解释。心理学洞察力的主要来源之一是启发式和偏见研究项目。本章介绍了心理学见解的另一个来源,即快速节俭启发式的生态合理性,并组织如下。首先,本章将生态理性的心理学(拉·吉格伦泽)和经济学(拉·史密斯)观点并列,从而将快速和节俭的启发式与行为经济学家(即实验经济学)的灵感和动机的主要来源联系起来。然后,它简要回顾了一系列文章,说明如何通过使用生态理性作为调查框架来理解启发式在商业决策中的成功使用。最后,它将行为经济学的研究领域定位在韦弗(1948)称之为有组织复杂性的区间内解决科学问题的连续体上。简单的启发式方法值得行为经济学家的特别关注,因为它们在精确的优化方法在结构上不适合的区间内效果最好。综上所述,这些联系、例子和论点表明,主流行为经济学可以从整合这一较少探索的心理学框架中获益。这种整合始于试图制定有效的决策规则,作为快速和节俭的启发式,并探索其生态合理性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信