Construction and Validation of Organizational Conflict Types and Conflict Management Styles Inventories

S. Qayyum, Faiz Younas, Shahnila Tariq
{"title":"Construction and Validation of Organizational Conflict Types and Conflict Management Styles Inventories","authors":"S. Qayyum, Faiz Younas, Shahnila Tariq","doi":"10.33824/pjpr.2022.37.4.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conflicts occupy a pertinent role in every aspect of human life and organizational settings are not an exception. In the absence of indigenous, comprehensive and latest assessment measures for organizational conflict types and management styles, the present study aimed to develop and validate inventories for both constructs by converging on the sociocultural context. Ensuing an exploratory sequential design, the investigation started with a qualitative study in which five focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with 30 professionals (including teachers, bankers, engineers, managers and doctors) who shared their experiences of organizational conflicts by highlighting types and management styles. From an initial pool of 137 items (65 & 72 items respectively), the subject matter experts finalized 55 items each for organizational conflict types and management style inventories. In study II, exploratory factor analysis was administered on a sample of 400 adult professionals resulting in a six-factor Qayyum-Younas Organizational Conflict Types Inventory (QY-OCTI) with 40 items. It was later confirmed by running a Confirmatory Factor Analysis on another sample of 400 professionals. In study III, EFA was conducted on a sample of 310 participants that revealed a six-factor model of the Qayyum-Younas Organizational Conflict Management Styles Inventory (QY-OCMSI) with 48 items and this model was later confirmed by running CFA on a sample of 490 participants. These scales have significant research, academic and organizational setting-based implications.","PeriodicalId":341086,"journal":{"name":"PJPR Vol. 37 No. 4 (2022)","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PJPR Vol. 37 No. 4 (2022)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33824/pjpr.2022.37.4.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conflicts occupy a pertinent role in every aspect of human life and organizational settings are not an exception. In the absence of indigenous, comprehensive and latest assessment measures for organizational conflict types and management styles, the present study aimed to develop and validate inventories for both constructs by converging on the sociocultural context. Ensuing an exploratory sequential design, the investigation started with a qualitative study in which five focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with 30 professionals (including teachers, bankers, engineers, managers and doctors) who shared their experiences of organizational conflicts by highlighting types and management styles. From an initial pool of 137 items (65 & 72 items respectively), the subject matter experts finalized 55 items each for organizational conflict types and management style inventories. In study II, exploratory factor analysis was administered on a sample of 400 adult professionals resulting in a six-factor Qayyum-Younas Organizational Conflict Types Inventory (QY-OCTI) with 40 items. It was later confirmed by running a Confirmatory Factor Analysis on another sample of 400 professionals. In study III, EFA was conducted on a sample of 310 participants that revealed a six-factor model of the Qayyum-Younas Organizational Conflict Management Styles Inventory (QY-OCMSI) with 48 items and this model was later confirmed by running CFA on a sample of 490 participants. These scales have significant research, academic and organizational setting-based implications.
组织冲突类型与冲突管理风格量表的构建与验证
冲突在人类生活的各个方面都扮演着重要的角色,组织环境也不例外。在缺乏针对组织冲突类型和管理风格的本土、全面和最新的评估措施的情况下,本研究旨在通过集中于社会文化背景来开发和验证这两种结构的清单。在探索性顺序设计之后,调查从定性研究开始,其中与30名专业人士(包括教师、银行家、工程师、经理和医生)进行了五次焦点小组讨论(fgd),他们通过强调组织冲突的类型和管理风格分享了他们的经验。从最初的137项(分别为65项和72项)中,主题专家为组织冲突类型和管理风格清单分别确定了55项。研究二采用探索性因子分析方法对400名成年专业人员进行问卷调查,编制了包含6个因素、40个条目的Qayyum-Younas组织冲突类型量表(QY-OCTI)。随后,在另一个400名专业人士的样本上进行了验证性因素分析,证实了这一点。在研究III中,对310名参与者进行了EFA,揭示了Qayyum-Younas组织冲突管理风格量表(QY-OCMSI)的六因素模型,该模型包含48个项目,随后通过对490名参与者进行CFA验证。这些量表具有重要的研究、学术和组织背景意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信