Development of a Competency-Based Scale to Assess Expertise of Orientation and Mobility Specialists in Long-Cane Training

Kimiko Wazumi, Toshikazu Yamamoto, Y. Hamada
{"title":"Development of a Competency-Based Scale to Assess Expertise of Orientation and Mobility Specialists in Long-Cane Training","authors":"Kimiko Wazumi, Toshikazu Yamamoto, Y. Hamada","doi":"10.6033/tokkyou.56.147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"― 156 ― In the present study, a competency-based assessment scale was developed to evaluate the expertise of orientation and mobility (O&M) specialists in long-cane training. In Survey 1, 2 O&M specialists developed a 45-item questionnaire, based on fındings by Horiuchi et al. (2008, in Japanese) that had suggested 3 viewpoints for long-cane training as part of the expertise of O&M specialists, and the resulting questionnaire was mailed to O&M specialists. Factor analyses, performed on the data obtained from 101 respondents, revealed that the questionnaire had 3 subscales, each of which was comprised of 10 items. The 3 factors were competency to utilize environmental cues to help individuals with visual impairments and blindness walk (factor 1), competency to evaluate the walking ability of individuals with visual impairments and blindness (factor 2), and competency to instruct individuals with visual impairments and blindness appropriate techniques considering their walking ability to environmental cues (factor 3). Cronbach’s α ranged from 0.86 to 0.91, showing high reliability. In Survey 2, in order to validate the scale, the O&M specialists’ data from Survey 1 were classifıed into 3 groups in relation to the length of each individual’s career as an O&M specialist: beginners (5 years or fewer), “pre-matured” (6 to 10 years), and matured (11 years or more). Correlations between length of career as an O&M specialist and the subscale scores ranged from low to moderate. An analysis of variance indicated that the “pre-matured” group’s scores were signifıcantly higher than the scores of the beginner group on factor 2, and the scores of the matured specialists were signifıcantly higher than the beginners’ scores on factor 3. The discussion deals with the reliability and validity of the scale.","PeriodicalId":353508,"journal":{"name":"The Japanese Journal of Special Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Japanese Journal of Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6033/tokkyou.56.147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

― 156 ― In the present study, a competency-based assessment scale was developed to evaluate the expertise of orientation and mobility (O&M) specialists in long-cane training. In Survey 1, 2 O&M specialists developed a 45-item questionnaire, based on fındings by Horiuchi et al. (2008, in Japanese) that had suggested 3 viewpoints for long-cane training as part of the expertise of O&M specialists, and the resulting questionnaire was mailed to O&M specialists. Factor analyses, performed on the data obtained from 101 respondents, revealed that the questionnaire had 3 subscales, each of which was comprised of 10 items. The 3 factors were competency to utilize environmental cues to help individuals with visual impairments and blindness walk (factor 1), competency to evaluate the walking ability of individuals with visual impairments and blindness (factor 2), and competency to instruct individuals with visual impairments and blindness appropriate techniques considering their walking ability to environmental cues (factor 3). Cronbach’s α ranged from 0.86 to 0.91, showing high reliability. In Survey 2, in order to validate the scale, the O&M specialists’ data from Survey 1 were classifıed into 3 groups in relation to the length of each individual’s career as an O&M specialist: beginners (5 years or fewer), “pre-matured” (6 to 10 years), and matured (11 years or more). Correlations between length of career as an O&M specialist and the subscale scores ranged from low to moderate. An analysis of variance indicated that the “pre-matured” group’s scores were signifıcantly higher than the scores of the beginner group on factor 2, and the scores of the matured specialists were signifıcantly higher than the beginners’ scores on factor 3. The discussion deals with the reliability and validity of the scale.
以能力为基础的量表来评估长手杖训练中定向和移动专家的专业知识
- 156 -在本研究中,开发了一个基于能力的评估量表来评估长手杖培训中的定向和移动(O&M)专家的专业知识。在调查1中,2位运维专家根据堀内等人(2008年,日文)的fındings提出了长手杖训练作为运维专家专业知识的3种观点,开发了一份45项的问卷,并将结果问卷邮寄给运维专家。对101名受访者的数据进行因子分析,发现问卷有3个子量表,每个子量表由10个项目组成。因子1是利用环境线索帮助视力障碍和失明个体行走的能力,因子2是评价视力障碍和失明个体行走能力的能力,因子3是指导视力障碍和失明个体根据环境线索采取适当的行走技术的能力。Cronbach’s α在0.86 ~ 0.91之间,具有较高的信度。在调查2中,为了验证量表,调查1中的运维专家数据classifıed根据每个人作为运维专家的职业生涯长度分为三组:初学者(5年或更短),“预成熟”(6至10年)和成熟(11年或更长)。作为运维专家的职业生涯长度与子量表得分之间的相关性从低到中等。方差分析表明,“未成熟”组在因子2上的得分signifıcantly高于初学者组,而成熟专家在因子3上的得分signifıcantly高于初学者组。讨论了量表的信度和效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信