An investigation and study on trainees of standardized residents' training programe in field of scientific research attitude and behavior

J. Yang, Peixin He, Xue Jiang, Ran Lu, Nan Wang, Haining Wang
{"title":"An investigation and study on trainees of standardized residents' training programe in field of scientific research attitude and behavior","authors":"J. Yang, Peixin He, Xue Jiang, Ran Lu, Nan Wang, Haining Wang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-677X.2019.12.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the current situation of the scientific research attitude and behavior of residents who are receiving standardized training, and providing reference for training clinicians with both standardized clinical ability and scientific research literacy. \n \n \nMethods \nForty-seven residents receiving standardized training at departments of internal medicine of Peking University Third Hospital were investigated in December 2018, the scientific research questionnaires were distributed to analyze their scientific research attitude and behavior. \n \n \nResults \nThere were 53.2% (25/47) of the residents are or willing to carry out scientific research. There were 38.3% (18/47) of the resident's scientific knowledge mainly comes from self-learning, the average time of reading medical literature in one week was 80.9% (38/47)for residents within 3 hours. 29.8% (14/47) and 21.3% (10/47) think that statistical analysis and research direction choice is the main weakness. Up to 12.8% (6/47) of the residents cannot raise scientific questions on clinical work, 10.6% (5/47) cannot organize and analyze literature, 25.5% (12/47) cannot choose the appropriate research methods to solve clinical questions and 19.1% (9/47) never write research papers independently. \n \n \nConclusions \nThe residents' scientific research attitude is not positive enough, the learning and practice in arising scientific questions, analyzing literature, solving questions and writing papers are insufficient. University-affiliated hospitals should actively explore the development of scientific research capacity training systems that conform to the characteristics of hospitals and the individual developement of residents. \n \n \nKey words: \nResident physician; Scientific research attitude; Scientific research behavior; Influencing factors","PeriodicalId":427675,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Medical Education","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-677X.2019.12.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To investigate the current situation of the scientific research attitude and behavior of residents who are receiving standardized training, and providing reference for training clinicians with both standardized clinical ability and scientific research literacy. Methods Forty-seven residents receiving standardized training at departments of internal medicine of Peking University Third Hospital were investigated in December 2018, the scientific research questionnaires were distributed to analyze their scientific research attitude and behavior. Results There were 53.2% (25/47) of the residents are or willing to carry out scientific research. There were 38.3% (18/47) of the resident's scientific knowledge mainly comes from self-learning, the average time of reading medical literature in one week was 80.9% (38/47)for residents within 3 hours. 29.8% (14/47) and 21.3% (10/47) think that statistical analysis and research direction choice is the main weakness. Up to 12.8% (6/47) of the residents cannot raise scientific questions on clinical work, 10.6% (5/47) cannot organize and analyze literature, 25.5% (12/47) cannot choose the appropriate research methods to solve clinical questions and 19.1% (9/47) never write research papers independently. Conclusions The residents' scientific research attitude is not positive enough, the learning and practice in arising scientific questions, analyzing literature, solving questions and writing papers are insufficient. University-affiliated hospitals should actively explore the development of scientific research capacity training systems that conform to the characteristics of hospitals and the individual developement of residents. Key words: Resident physician; Scientific research attitude; Scientific research behavior; Influencing factors
规范化住院医师培训项目学员科研态度与行为的调查研究
目的了解正在接受规范化培训的住院医师科研态度和行为现状,为培养兼具规范化临床能力和科研素养的临床医生提供参考。方法对2018年12月在北京大学第三医院内科接受规范化培训的住院医师47名进行调查,发放科研问卷,分析其科研态度和行为。结果有53.2%(25/47)的居民表示愿意或愿意开展科学研究。38.3%(18/47)住院医师的科学知识主要来自于自学,每周平均3小时内阅读医学文献的时间为80.9%(38/47)。29.8%(14/47)和21.3%(10/47)认为统计分析和研究方向选择是主要弱点。12.8%(6/47)的住院医师不会对临床工作提出科学问题,10.6%(5/47)的住院医师不会整理和分析文献,25.5%(12/47)的住院医师不会选择合适的研究方法来解决临床问题,19.1%(9/47)的住院医师从未独立撰写过研究论文。结论居民科研态度不够积极,在提出科学问题、分析文献、解决问题、撰写论文等方面的学习和实践不足。高校附属医院应积极探索发展符合医院特点和住院医师个体发展的科研能力培养体系。关键词:住院医师;科研态度;科研行为;影响因素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信