{"title":"Husserl’s Teleologie der «tiefen» Assoziationen as Foundation of the Theory of Judgment in comparison with Millikan’s Teleosemantic Theory","authors":"Andrea Lanza","doi":"10.36253/aisthesis-13152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper inquires Husserl’s immanent teleology of conscious life, conceived as a Teleologie der «tiefen» Assoziationen. The associative genesis entails synthetical processes in the primordial-associative field, driven by the general concept of interest. The resulting syntheses ground the various forms of judgments, both judgments on experience and predicative ones in general. Since the theory’s foundation relies on pre-predicative experience, then it must encompass its teleological dimension and, in this sense, the concept of evidence – pivotal in the theory – mirrors the result of the synthesis of fulfilment. This latter, in turn, is driven in an asymptotic path towards a teleological idea of adequacy. This account expresses the complementary mirroring that characterizes the relationship between judging and teleology, without the need to separate teleology from reason. In order to highlight the significance of this framing, the paper is closed by a brief comparison with R. Millikan’s teleosemantic theory, whose concept of teleology is shown as flawed by the general concerns proper to naturalism.","PeriodicalId":447022,"journal":{"name":"Aisthesis. Pratiche, linguaggi e saperi dell’estetico","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aisthesis. Pratiche, linguaggi e saperi dell’estetico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/aisthesis-13152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The paper inquires Husserl’s immanent teleology of conscious life, conceived as a Teleologie der «tiefen» Assoziationen. The associative genesis entails synthetical processes in the primordial-associative field, driven by the general concept of interest. The resulting syntheses ground the various forms of judgments, both judgments on experience and predicative ones in general. Since the theory’s foundation relies on pre-predicative experience, then it must encompass its teleological dimension and, in this sense, the concept of evidence – pivotal in the theory – mirrors the result of the synthesis of fulfilment. This latter, in turn, is driven in an asymptotic path towards a teleological idea of adequacy. This account expresses the complementary mirroring that characterizes the relationship between judging and teleology, without the need to separate teleology from reason. In order to highlight the significance of this framing, the paper is closed by a brief comparison with R. Millikan’s teleosemantic theory, whose concept of teleology is shown as flawed by the general concerns proper to naturalism.
本文探讨胡塞尔关于意识生命的内在目的论,即“联系的目的论”(Teleologie der tiefen associationen)。联想的发生需要在原始联想场的综合过程,由一般的兴趣概念驱动。由此产生的综合为各种形式的判断奠定了基础,既有经验判断,也有一般的谓词判断。由于该理论的基础依赖于预述经验,那么它必须包含其目的论维度,在这个意义上,证据的概念——理论的关键——反映了实现综合的结果。后者,反过来,被推动在一个渐进的道路上的目的论思想的充分性。这种描述表达了互补镜像,这是判断和目的论之间关系的特征,而不需要将目的论与理性分开。为了突出这一框架的重要性,本文最后与密立根的目的论理论进行了简短的比较,密立根的目的论概念被自然主义的普遍关注所表明是有缺陷的。