(Meta)Theoretical gateways in studies on assessment and documentation in preschool : a research review with a Scandinavian focus

A. Roth
{"title":"(Meta)Theoretical gateways in studies on assessment and documentation in preschool : a research review with a Scandinavian focus","authors":"A. Roth","doi":"10.7577/NBF.1575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to describe and collate search results and analysis of research with a focus on (meta)theoretical gateways in assessment and documentation in Scandinavian preschools between 2006 and 2014, supplemented by delimited international research mainly from 2013-2014. The intention is also to highlight what the research indicates about assessment competence in relation to the (meta)theoretical gateways.  The final search results include 153 national and international studies from sources including the Nordic Base of Early Childhood Education and Care (NB-ECEC, 2006-2012). The results indicate that research into assessment in preschool is still a relatively young and undeveloped field, while the field of documentation, and pedagogical documentation in particular, has a significantly higher standing. As more and more different forms of assessment and documentation assume their place in preschools, it becomes increasingly important to gain knowledge and awareness of the potential benefits, limitations and consequences of various forms and practices for assessment and documentation. Theoretical gateways vary, as do the forms of assessment and documentation used. The analysis indicates that assessment competence can include professional assessment based on a variety of scientific grounds. Regarding the expanded documentation and evaluation task and the preschool’s complex assessment and documentation practices, there is a need for both expanded research and expanded competence, which can focus on a multi-voiced assessment competence.","PeriodicalId":346813,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk Barnehageforskning","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordisk Barnehageforskning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7577/NBF.1575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to describe and collate search results and analysis of research with a focus on (meta)theoretical gateways in assessment and documentation in Scandinavian preschools between 2006 and 2014, supplemented by delimited international research mainly from 2013-2014. The intention is also to highlight what the research indicates about assessment competence in relation to the (meta)theoretical gateways.  The final search results include 153 national and international studies from sources including the Nordic Base of Early Childhood Education and Care (NB-ECEC, 2006-2012). The results indicate that research into assessment in preschool is still a relatively young and undeveloped field, while the field of documentation, and pedagogical documentation in particular, has a significantly higher standing. As more and more different forms of assessment and documentation assume their place in preschools, it becomes increasingly important to gain knowledge and awareness of the potential benefits, limitations and consequences of various forms and practices for assessment and documentation. Theoretical gateways vary, as do the forms of assessment and documentation used. The analysis indicates that assessment competence can include professional assessment based on a variety of scientific grounds. Regarding the expanded documentation and evaluation task and the preschool’s complex assessment and documentation practices, there is a need for both expanded research and expanded competence, which can focus on a multi-voiced assessment competence.
(元)学前教育评估与文献研究的理论关口:以斯堪的纳维亚为焦点的研究综述
本文的目的是描述和整理研究的搜索结果和分析,重点是2006年至2014年斯堪的纳维亚学龄前儿童评估和文献的(元)理论网关,并补充了主要从2013年至2014年的划界国际研究。目的还在于强调研究表明的与(元)理论关口有关的评估能力。最终的搜索结果包括153个国家和国际研究,来源包括北欧幼儿教育和护理基地(NB-ECEC, 2006-2012)。研究结果表明,学前评估研究仍是一个相对年轻和不发达的领域,而文献研究领域,特别是教学文献研究领域的地位明显较高。随着越来越多的不同形式的评估和文件在学前教育中占有一席之地,了解和认识各种评估和文件形式和做法的潜在好处、局限性和后果变得越来越重要。理论网关各不相同,所使用的评估和文档的形式也各不相同。分析表明,评估能力可以包括基于多种科学依据的专业评估。针对拓展的文献评价任务和幼儿复杂的评价文献实践,需要开展拓展研究和拓展能力,重点关注多元评价能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信