RANKING OF CRITERIA BY THE METHOD OF EXPERT EVALUATIONS OF JUDO JUDGES ACCORDING TO THE PERFORMANCE OF COMPETITIONS

Abstract

Using a questionnaire and methods of expert evaluation of judges in judo to identify the main criteria for evaluating the work of judges in competitions. A questionnaire survey of judo judges was conducted. The study involved 30 judo judges of the international category (3 men - 10%) of the national category (15 people - 50%) and the first category (12 people - 40%). The analysis of the survey of judo judges on the basis of 50 evaluation criteria for the performance of judges in competitions revealed the main 11 criteria that are in the opinion of most experts the most effective. Thus, 11 criteria were distributed among specialists of international, national and first categories of judges based on the results of calculating the coefficient of weight and priority as follows: in the first place - professional ethics and discipline 1.33; in second place - the appearance of 1.66; in third place - knowledge of the rules and the ability to use them 3.66; in fourth place - is the clarity of commands and gestures 4.66; in fifth place - moving on the tatami and choosing the correct position 5.00; in sixth place - interaction with judges 6.67; in seventh place - the ability to correctly and timely assess errors 7.66; in eighth place - the ability to accurately and timely assess technical actions 8.00; in ninth place - psychological stability 8.33; in tenth place - the reaction to the situation 8.66; on the eleventh place - the ability to use technical means 10,33. Thus, the survey of judges' categories from the 50 proposed criteria revealed 11 most practical criteria by which it is possible to evaluate the work of judges in competitions.