Writing Memos: A Vital Classic Grounded Theory Task

Barry Chametzky
{"title":"Writing Memos: A Vital Classic Grounded Theory Task","authors":"Barry Chametzky","doi":"10.24018/ejsocial.2023.3.1.377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The process of writing and sorting memos is an important and indeed vital component of doing a classic grounded theory study. Writing memos allows a researcher to move from description to richer, more mature memos ultimately ending with a sophisticated, rich, conceptual, multivariate theory. Memos are compared one with another through a method called constant comparison. Any heretofore unknown connections are established during the comparison and sorting process. These connections develop and become increasingly conceptual during the entire memoing process. Through the entire mandatory process of writing and sorting memos that have been presented in many works of Glaser, the problem is that it is still misunderstood by novice researchers who have not experienced such a process and who are more accustomed to various analytic procedures common in qualitative data analysis. In this methodological paper, I will take the reader broadly through the memo process to present and further elucidate this important and sometimes confusing tenet of classic grounded theory. The purpose of this methodological paper is to provide explanations regarding the memo process in classic grounded theory.","PeriodicalId":238752,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejsocial.2023.3.1.377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The process of writing and sorting memos is an important and indeed vital component of doing a classic grounded theory study. Writing memos allows a researcher to move from description to richer, more mature memos ultimately ending with a sophisticated, rich, conceptual, multivariate theory. Memos are compared one with another through a method called constant comparison. Any heretofore unknown connections are established during the comparison and sorting process. These connections develop and become increasingly conceptual during the entire memoing process. Through the entire mandatory process of writing and sorting memos that have been presented in many works of Glaser, the problem is that it is still misunderstood by novice researchers who have not experienced such a process and who are more accustomed to various analytic procedures common in qualitative data analysis. In this methodological paper, I will take the reader broadly through the memo process to present and further elucidate this important and sometimes confusing tenet of classic grounded theory. The purpose of this methodological paper is to provide explanations regarding the memo process in classic grounded theory.
写备忘录:一个重要的经典接地理论任务
撰写和整理备忘录的过程是进行经典理论研究的重要且至关重要的组成部分。撰写备忘录可以使研究人员从描述过渡到更丰富、更成熟的备忘录,最终形成一个复杂、丰富、概念性的多元理论。备忘录之间通过一种称为常数比较的方法进行比较。任何之前未知的联系都是在比较和排序过程中建立起来的。这些联系在整个会议过程中不断发展并变得越来越概念化。在Glaser的许多著作中都展示了备忘录的写作和整理的整个强制性过程,但问题是,它仍然被没有经历过这样一个过程的新手研究人员所误解,他们更习惯于定性数据分析中常见的各种分析程序。在这篇方法论论文中,我将带领读者广泛地通过备忘录过程来呈现和进一步阐明这一重要的、有时令人困惑的经典扎根理论原则。这篇方法论论文的目的是在经典的扎根理论中提供关于备忘录过程的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书