W. W. Ang, M. Charalambides, A. Overton, Chalaralambos Charalambides
{"title":"Predictors of Outcome in Hallux Valgus Surgery","authors":"W. W. Ang, M. Charalambides, A. Overton, Chalaralambos Charalambides","doi":"10.37515/ortho.8231.3305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Hallux valgus (HV) is the most common forefoot deformity, and is known to be a debilitating disease, causing pain and reduced social function. There are various established surgical treatments for HV, with patient satisfaction up to 85% after surgery. In this paper, we aim to identify the pre-operative factors that may serve as predictors to patient outcome after surgery, to help surgeons select suitable candidates for surgery in the clinic. Methods: A prospective study was done on patients who underwent scarf and akin osteotomy for symptomatic HV between October 2015 and March 2018. Five patient factors were collected pre-operatively, including osteoarthritis grade of first metatarsophalangeal joint, severity of HV, presence of osteoarthritic or sesamoid pain, and presence of flat foot. Patient’s self-reported outcomes was assessed pre- and post-surgery, using the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and Visual Analogue Score (VAS). Pre- and post-surgery outcome scores were compared, and changes in scores analysed with numerous patient factors to identify any significant association. Results: 41 feet of 36 patients were included after implementation of exclusion criteria. Both MOXFQ and VAS showed a significant reduction in scores (improvement in outcomes) after surgery. None of the pre-operative patient factors examined was found to be significantly associated with the reduction in MOXFQ score. However, the results suggested that high pre-surgery MOXFQ score was associated with a greater MOXFQ score reduction post-surgery, with p-value of <0.001. Conclusion: Our study found that none of the factors looked at significantly correlated with reductions in MOXFQ and VAS scores post-surgery, other than high presurgery MOXFQ scores. This suggests that surgeons should counsel as such in clinic. Nonetheless, as this study had a small study size, further studies should be done to support the findings of this research.","PeriodicalId":252930,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Orthopaedic Research","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Orthopaedic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37515/ortho.8231.3305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Hallux valgus (HV) is the most common forefoot deformity, and is known to be a debilitating disease, causing pain and reduced social function. There are various established surgical treatments for HV, with patient satisfaction up to 85% after surgery. In this paper, we aim to identify the pre-operative factors that may serve as predictors to patient outcome after surgery, to help surgeons select suitable candidates for surgery in the clinic. Methods: A prospective study was done on patients who underwent scarf and akin osteotomy for symptomatic HV between October 2015 and March 2018. Five patient factors were collected pre-operatively, including osteoarthritis grade of first metatarsophalangeal joint, severity of HV, presence of osteoarthritic or sesamoid pain, and presence of flat foot. Patient’s self-reported outcomes was assessed pre- and post-surgery, using the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and Visual Analogue Score (VAS). Pre- and post-surgery outcome scores were compared, and changes in scores analysed with numerous patient factors to identify any significant association. Results: 41 feet of 36 patients were included after implementation of exclusion criteria. Both MOXFQ and VAS showed a significant reduction in scores (improvement in outcomes) after surgery. None of the pre-operative patient factors examined was found to be significantly associated with the reduction in MOXFQ score. However, the results suggested that high pre-surgery MOXFQ score was associated with a greater MOXFQ score reduction post-surgery, with p-value of <0.001. Conclusion: Our study found that none of the factors looked at significantly correlated with reductions in MOXFQ and VAS scores post-surgery, other than high presurgery MOXFQ scores. This suggests that surgeons should counsel as such in clinic. Nonetheless, as this study had a small study size, further studies should be done to support the findings of this research.