Grocery retailer's brand performances from brand personalities and marketing offerings

H. Duh, O. Pwaka
{"title":"Grocery retailer's brand performances from brand personalities and marketing offerings","authors":"H. Duh, O. Pwaka","doi":"10.1108/ijrdm-10-2022-0404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeDespite competition and supply-chain disruptions during Covid-19 pandemic (2019–2021), one grocery retailer consistently thrived and was ranked top. The sources of the sustained performances needed examination. Guided by self-congruity theory and integrating three models, the authors examined how much the retailer's brand performances (brand loyalty, equity, preference and repurchase intentions) were emanating from brand personalities and marketing offerings. The mediating roles of brand loyalty and equity were tested.Design/methodology/approachCross-sectional data was collected from 480 frequent customers using an online questionnaire posted on the researchers' social media pages. Factor analysis was conducted to identify the dimension that best describes the grocery retailer. Partial least square–structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) was used to test a conceptual model.FindingsFactor analysis results show that brand sincerity (28.582% variance-explained; M = 4.1) was top (factor 1), followed by excitement (20.336% variance-explained; M = 3.9) and then trustworthiness (18.854% variance-explained; M = 3.87). PLS-SEM results revealed that two brand personalities (brand excitement and trustworthiness) and marketing offerings (price, place, product, promotion) impacted loyalty found to be a strong driver of brand equity. Repurchase intention and brand preference were influenced by brand equity. Brand loyalty mediated most of the relationships between brand personality dimensions, marketing offerings and brand equity. Brand equity also significantly mediated the relationships between brand loyalty, preference and repurchase intentions. The integrated model produced high explanatory powers with brand equity (67.8%), brand preference (71.7%), brand loyalty (63.2%) and repurchase intentions (54.2%).Originality/valueThe study extends a brand personality-loyalty model through integrating two other models that provided marketing offerings and brand equity outcomes. It demonstrates that a stream of profitable customers' responses awaits a retailer who holds both brand and customer mindsets by building admired brand personalities while providing desired marketing offerings.","PeriodicalId":241946,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-10-2022-0404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeDespite competition and supply-chain disruptions during Covid-19 pandemic (2019–2021), one grocery retailer consistently thrived and was ranked top. The sources of the sustained performances needed examination. Guided by self-congruity theory and integrating three models, the authors examined how much the retailer's brand performances (brand loyalty, equity, preference and repurchase intentions) were emanating from brand personalities and marketing offerings. The mediating roles of brand loyalty and equity were tested.Design/methodology/approachCross-sectional data was collected from 480 frequent customers using an online questionnaire posted on the researchers' social media pages. Factor analysis was conducted to identify the dimension that best describes the grocery retailer. Partial least square–structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) was used to test a conceptual model.FindingsFactor analysis results show that brand sincerity (28.582% variance-explained; M = 4.1) was top (factor 1), followed by excitement (20.336% variance-explained; M = 3.9) and then trustworthiness (18.854% variance-explained; M = 3.87). PLS-SEM results revealed that two brand personalities (brand excitement and trustworthiness) and marketing offerings (price, place, product, promotion) impacted loyalty found to be a strong driver of brand equity. Repurchase intention and brand preference were influenced by brand equity. Brand loyalty mediated most of the relationships between brand personality dimensions, marketing offerings and brand equity. Brand equity also significantly mediated the relationships between brand loyalty, preference and repurchase intentions. The integrated model produced high explanatory powers with brand equity (67.8%), brand preference (71.7%), brand loyalty (63.2%) and repurchase intentions (54.2%).Originality/valueThe study extends a brand personality-loyalty model through integrating two other models that provided marketing offerings and brand equity outcomes. It demonstrates that a stream of profitable customers' responses awaits a retailer who holds both brand and customer mindsets by building admired brand personalities while providing desired marketing offerings.
杂货零售商的品牌表现从品牌个性和营销产品
在2019-2021年新冠肺炎大流行期间,尽管竞争激烈,供应链中断,但一家杂货零售商始终蓬勃发展,并名列榜首。持续表现的来源需要审查。在自我一致性理论的指导下,作者整合了三个模型,研究了零售商的品牌绩效(品牌忠诚度、股权、偏好和回购意愿)在多大程度上来自品牌个性和营销产品。检验了品牌忠诚和品牌公平的中介作用。设计/方法/方法通过在研究人员的社交媒体页面上发布的在线问卷,从480名常客中收集横截面数据。进行因子分析,以确定最能描述杂货零售商的维度。采用偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)对概念模型进行检验。因素分析结果显示,品牌诚信(28.582%)方差解释;M = 4.1)是最重要的(因子1),其次是兴奋(20.336%方差解释;M = 3.9),然后是可信度(18.854%方差解释;m = 3.87)。PLS-SEM结果显示,两种品牌个性(品牌兴奋度和可信度)和营销产品(价格、地点、产品、促销)影响忠诚度,是品牌资产的强大驱动力。品牌资产对回购意愿和品牌偏好有影响。品牌忠诚度在品牌个性维度、营销产品和品牌资产之间的关系中起主要中介作用。品牌资产在品牌忠诚、偏好与再购买意愿之间也有显著中介作用。整合模型对品牌资产(67.8%)、品牌偏好(71.7%)、品牌忠诚度(63.2%)和回购意愿(54.2%)均产生了较高的解释力。独创性/价值本研究通过整合另外两个提供营销产品和品牌资产结果的模型,扩展了品牌个性-忠诚度模型。这表明,在提供理想的营销服务的同时,通过建立令人钦佩的品牌个性,同时掌握品牌和客户心态的零售商,将获得一系列有利可图的客户反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信