Case studies of central office cable tray support failures

D. McMenamin
{"title":"Case studies of central office cable tray support failures","authors":"D. McMenamin","doi":"10.1109/INTLEC.1994.396652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concrete anchor devices are an extremely important consideration when designing for network reliability. Most telephone central office cabling is supported on overhead cable racks or trays. Stored program control switching systems (SPCS) frames and modern transport equipment frames tend to be approximately 7 feet (178 cm) tall. Express cable trays to the power plant and main distributing frame (MDF) areas are usually supported by an auxiliary framing grid suspended from the ceiling slab. From a structural and earthquake protection viewpoint, both the equipment frames and the overhead structures are now separate and independent systems. This is a superior design plan, especially where building vibration or seismic activity is a consideration. Since metallic cabling, especially copper power cables, are quite heavy, all support elements must be capable of handling massive loads safely and reliably. Virtually all of the weight is borne by cast-in-place structures such as ceiling inserts, and embedded channel struts, or by anchors which are drilled and set by a variety of fastening systems. Two cable tray collapse failures in eastern Pennsylvania underscore the fact that some anchor designs are more prone to failure than others. This paper describes case studies of the two failures, and their root-cause investigations. Additionally, the paper discusses the results of dynamic pull-out tests, performed both in the laboratory and the field, on several traditional and newer style anchor designs, exploring their merits and drawbacks.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":123164,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Intelec 94","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Intelec 94","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INTLEC.1994.396652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Concrete anchor devices are an extremely important consideration when designing for network reliability. Most telephone central office cabling is supported on overhead cable racks or trays. Stored program control switching systems (SPCS) frames and modern transport equipment frames tend to be approximately 7 feet (178 cm) tall. Express cable trays to the power plant and main distributing frame (MDF) areas are usually supported by an auxiliary framing grid suspended from the ceiling slab. From a structural and earthquake protection viewpoint, both the equipment frames and the overhead structures are now separate and independent systems. This is a superior design plan, especially where building vibration or seismic activity is a consideration. Since metallic cabling, especially copper power cables, are quite heavy, all support elements must be capable of handling massive loads safely and reliably. Virtually all of the weight is borne by cast-in-place structures such as ceiling inserts, and embedded channel struts, or by anchors which are drilled and set by a variety of fastening systems. Two cable tray collapse failures in eastern Pennsylvania underscore the fact that some anchor designs are more prone to failure than others. This paper describes case studies of the two failures, and their root-cause investigations. Additionally, the paper discusses the results of dynamic pull-out tests, performed both in the laboratory and the field, on several traditional and newer style anchor designs, exploring their merits and drawbacks.<>
中央办公室电缆桥架支撑失效案例研究
混凝土锚固装置是网络可靠性设计中极为重要的考虑因素。大多数电话中心办公室的电缆是由架空电缆架或托盘支撑的。存储程序控制交换系统(SPCS)框架和现代运输设备框架往往是大约7英尺(178厘米)高。通往发电厂和主配线架(MDF)区域的快速电缆桥架通常由悬挂在天花板上的辅助框架网支撑。从结构和抗震的角度来看,设备框架和架空结构现在都是独立的系统。这是一种优越的设计方案,特别是在考虑建筑物振动或地震活动的情况下。由于金属电缆,特别是铜电力电缆,相当重,所有的支撑元件必须能够安全可靠地处理巨大的负载。几乎所有的重量都是由现浇结构承担的,比如吊顶嵌件、嵌入式通道支柱,或者是通过各种紧固系统钻孔和固定的锚。宾夕法尼亚州东部的两个电缆桥架坍塌事故强调了这样一个事实,即一些锚设计比其他锚设计更容易失效。本文介绍了这两种故障的案例研究,以及它们的根本原因调查。此外,本文还讨论了在实验室和现场对几种传统和新型锚杆设计进行的动态抽拔试验结果,探讨了它们的优缺点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信