ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS PEMBERITAAN PENATAAN TAMAN NASIONAL KOMODO PADA TRIBUNNEWS.COM DAN DETIK.COM

M. Teguh, Rini Riyantini, I. Cahyani
{"title":"ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS PEMBERITAAN PENATAAN TAMAN NASIONAL KOMODO PADA TRIBUNNEWS.COM DAN DETIK.COM","authors":"M. Teguh, Rini Riyantini, I. Cahyani","doi":"10.32509/PUSTAKOM.V4I2.1572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The arrangement of the Komodo National Park which will turn this national park into a premium tourist destination has caused controversy between the people who disagree with the arrangement and the government. The existing arrangement is feared to disturb the habitat and the original ecosystem of the Komodo dragon and will complicate conservation activities. This controversy has increasingly attracted public attention with the appearance of photos of Komodo blocking trucks that go viral on social media. The mass media in this case also reported on this. This research was conducted to prove the alignment of the news on the arrangement of the Komodo National Park on tribunnews.com and detik.com. Which is carried out using the critical discourse analysis method on news texts in both media. This study uses a qualitative approach so that it can see more deeply the meaning behind the discourse. The research proves that the media tend to choose one party in constructing an event. Tribunnews.com proved to be in favor of the government by displaying statements submitted by the government and positive things from the arrangement. On the other hand, detik.com shows siding with the people who voice their rejection and view the existing arrangement negatively.","PeriodicalId":191134,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pustaka Komunikasi","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pustaka Komunikasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32509/PUSTAKOM.V4I2.1572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The arrangement of the Komodo National Park which will turn this national park into a premium tourist destination has caused controversy between the people who disagree with the arrangement and the government. The existing arrangement is feared to disturb the habitat and the original ecosystem of the Komodo dragon and will complicate conservation activities. This controversy has increasingly attracted public attention with the appearance of photos of Komodo blocking trucks that go viral on social media. The mass media in this case also reported on this. This research was conducted to prove the alignment of the news on the arrangement of the Komodo National Park on tribunnews.com and detik.com. Which is carried out using the critical discourse analysis method on news texts in both media. This study uses a qualitative approach so that it can see more deeply the meaning behind the discourse. The research proves that the media tend to choose one party in constructing an event. Tribunnews.com proved to be in favor of the government by displaying statements submitted by the government and positive things from the arrangement. On the other hand, detik.com shows siding with the people who voice their rejection and view the existing arrangement negatively.
法庭上,科莫多国家公园的官方新闻发布分析
科莫多国家公园的安排将把这个国家公园变成一个优质的旅游目的地,这引起了不同意安排的人和政府之间的争议。现有的安排担心会破坏科莫多龙的栖息地和原始生态系统,并将使保护活动复杂化。随着科莫多阻挡卡车的照片在社交媒体上疯传,这一争议越来越引起公众的关注。在这个案例中,大众媒体也对此进行了报道。这项研究是为了证明新闻在论坛网站和detik.com上关于科莫多国家公园安排的一致性。本文采用批判性话语分析方法对两种媒体的新闻文本进行分析。本研究采用定性方法,以便更深入地看到话语背后的意义。研究证明,媒体在建构事件时倾向于选择一方。Tribunnews.com通过展示政府提交的声明和该安排的积极内容,证明了自己是支持政府的。另一方面,detik.com站在了反对现有安排的人一边。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信