Study and Comparison of QDI Pipeline Components’ Sensitivity to Permanent Faults

Raghda El Shehaby, A. Steininger
{"title":"Study and Comparison of QDI Pipeline Components’ Sensitivity to Permanent Faults","authors":"Raghda El Shehaby, A. Steininger","doi":"10.1109/DFT56152.2022.9962353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the presence of permanent faults, QDI circuits exhibit the beneficial property of halting their operation until a repair procedure has been conducted. The state in which the circuit resides, however, does not always remain clean, i.e., a recovery process might be needed. This depends on how the circuit reacts in these situations. In this study, we investigate the effect a permanent fault has on the different components of the pipeline, the logic function unit and the butter. Our aim is to identify the weaknesses of each component and try to enhance each one accordingly. We perform extensive fault-injection simulations on different circuits following the famous 4-phase communication protocol, while varying the logic function and butter style for comparison. Our results show that the logic function does not affect the resilience of a specific butter type, and hence we can deduce which butter should perform better for a specific application based on parameters we extract from our experiments. On a parallel note, the implementation style of the logic also has an impact on the block’s ability to hold out against faults. We investigate two of these styles.","PeriodicalId":411011,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI and Nanotechnology Systems (DFT)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI and Nanotechnology Systems (DFT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DFT56152.2022.9962353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the presence of permanent faults, QDI circuits exhibit the beneficial property of halting their operation until a repair procedure has been conducted. The state in which the circuit resides, however, does not always remain clean, i.e., a recovery process might be needed. This depends on how the circuit reacts in these situations. In this study, we investigate the effect a permanent fault has on the different components of the pipeline, the logic function unit and the butter. Our aim is to identify the weaknesses of each component and try to enhance each one accordingly. We perform extensive fault-injection simulations on different circuits following the famous 4-phase communication protocol, while varying the logic function and butter style for comparison. Our results show that the logic function does not affect the resilience of a specific butter type, and hence we can deduce which butter should perform better for a specific application based on parameters we extract from our experiments. On a parallel note, the implementation style of the logic also has an impact on the block’s ability to hold out against faults. We investigate two of these styles.
QDI管道元件对永久性故障敏感性的研究与比较
在存在永久性故障时,QDI电路表现出停止其操作直到进行修复程序的有益特性。然而,电路所处的状态并不总是保持干净,也就是说,可能需要一个恢复过程。这取决于电路在这些情况下的反应。在本研究中,我们研究了永久故障对管道、逻辑功能单元和黄油的不同组成部分的影响。我们的目标是找出每个组件的弱点,并尝试相应地增强每个组件。我们根据著名的四相通信协议在不同的电路上进行了广泛的故障注入模拟,同时改变了逻辑功能和黄油风格进行比较。我们的结果表明,逻辑函数不会影响特定黄油类型的弹性,因此我们可以根据从实验中提取的参数推断出哪种黄油在特定应用中表现更好。同时,逻辑的实现风格也会影响块抵御故障的能力。我们研究其中的两种风格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信