The 2nd Baltic Osseointegration Academy and Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Consensus Conference 2019. Summary and Consensus Statements: Group II - Extraction Socket Preservation Methods and Dental Implant Placement Outcomes within Grafted Sockets

P. Galindo-Moreno, Fernando Suárez López del Amo, R. Faria‐Almeida, B. Almeida, Inesa Astramskaite-Januseviciene, S. Barootchi, Tiago Borges, A. Correia, Francisco Correia, J. Majzoub, M. Padial-Molina, Mindaugas Pranskunas, A. Puišys, A. Ramanauskaite, A. Ravidá, T. Starch-Jensen, M. Tattan
{"title":"The 2nd Baltic Osseointegration Academy and Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Consensus Conference 2019. Summary and Consensus Statements: Group II - Extraction Socket Preservation Methods and Dental Implant Placement Outcomes within Grafted Sockets","authors":"P. Galindo-Moreno, Fernando Suárez López del Amo, R. Faria‐Almeida, B. Almeida, Inesa Astramskaite-Januseviciene, S. Barootchi, Tiago Borges, A. Correia, Francisco Correia, J. Majzoub, M. Padial-Molina, Mindaugas Pranskunas, A. Puišys, A. Ramanauskaite, A. Ravidá, T. Starch-Jensen, M. Tattan","doi":"10.5037/jomr.2019.10309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction The task of Group II was to review and update the existing data concerning extraction socket preservation with or without membranes and soft tissue influence on post-extraction alveolar ridge preservation; extraction socket preservation using different biomaterials as bone grafts, growth factors, and stem cells. Special interest was paid to the dental implant placement outcomes within grafted sockets. Material and Methods The main areas evaluated by this group were as follows: quantitative and qualitative assessment of the effect of different alveolar preservation techniques performed immediately after tooth extraction, with or without membranes and/or soft tissue grafting, and the use of different bone substitutes, stem cells or growth factors in the postextraction socket. Evaluation of the treatment outcomes of dental implants placed in the grafted sockets in terms of primary and secondary outcomes were assessed. The systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses were registered in PROSPERO, an international prospective register of systematic reviews: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/. TThe literature in the corresponding areas of interest was screened and reported following the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) Statement: http://www.prisma-statement.org/. Method of preparation of the systematic reviews, based on comprehensive search strategies, was discussed and standardized. The summary of the materials and methods employed by the authors in preparing the systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses is presented in the Preface chapter. Results The results and conclusions of the review process are presented in the respective papers. Three systematic reviews and one systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. The group's general commentaries, consensus statements, clinical recommendations and implications for research are presented in this article.","PeriodicalId":230885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Research","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2019.10309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction The task of Group II was to review and update the existing data concerning extraction socket preservation with or without membranes and soft tissue influence on post-extraction alveolar ridge preservation; extraction socket preservation using different biomaterials as bone grafts, growth factors, and stem cells. Special interest was paid to the dental implant placement outcomes within grafted sockets. Material and Methods The main areas evaluated by this group were as follows: quantitative and qualitative assessment of the effect of different alveolar preservation techniques performed immediately after tooth extraction, with or without membranes and/or soft tissue grafting, and the use of different bone substitutes, stem cells or growth factors in the postextraction socket. Evaluation of the treatment outcomes of dental implants placed in the grafted sockets in terms of primary and secondary outcomes were assessed. The systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses were registered in PROSPERO, an international prospective register of systematic reviews: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/. TThe literature in the corresponding areas of interest was screened and reported following the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) Statement: http://www.prisma-statement.org/. Method of preparation of the systematic reviews, based on comprehensive search strategies, was discussed and standardized. The summary of the materials and methods employed by the authors in preparing the systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses is presented in the Preface chapter. Results The results and conclusions of the review process are presented in the respective papers. Three systematic reviews and one systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. The group's general commentaries, consensus statements, clinical recommendations and implications for research are presented in this article.
第二届波罗的海骨整合学会和立陶宛健康科学大学共识会议2019。总结和共识声明:第二组:拔牙槽保存方法和牙种植体在移植槽内的放置效果
第二组的任务是回顾和更新关于有或没有膜的拔牙槽保存和软组织对拔牙后牙槽嵴保存的影响的现有数据;使用不同的生物材料如骨移植物、生长因子和干细胞保存拔牙槽。特别关注的是种植体在移植牙槽内的放置效果。材料和方法本组主要评估的领域为:定量和定性评估拔牙后立即进行不同的牙槽保存技术,有或没有膜和/或软组织移植,以及在拔牙后窝中使用不同的骨替代品、干细胞或生长因子的效果。从主要和次要结果的角度评估牙种植体放置在植牙槽内的治疗结果。系统评价和/或荟萃分析在国际前瞻性系统评价注册网站PROSPERO上注册:http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/。根据PRISMA指南(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)声明对相关领域的文献进行筛选和报告:http://www.prisma-statement.org/。讨论并规范了基于综合检索策略的系统综述的编制方法。作者在准备系统综述和/或荟萃分析时使用的材料和方法的总结在前言章节中提出。结果综述过程的结果和结论分别发表在各自的论文中。进行了3次系统评价和1次系统评价和荟萃分析。该小组的一般评论,共识声明,临床建议和研究的意义在这篇文章中提出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信