College Students’ Academic Achievement: Exploring the Role of Hope and Academic Self-Efficacy

Esther C. Penzar, Munyi Shea, C. Edwards
{"title":"College Students’ Academic Achievement: Exploring the Role of Hope and Academic Self-Efficacy","authors":"Esther C. Penzar, Munyi Shea, C. Edwards","doi":"10.53308/ide.v8i1.243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present study, the relationships among trait hope, academic self-efficacy, and academic achievement (self-reported GPA) were examined among college students. Demographic differences were analyzed based on college-going status, ethnicity, and gender. First-generation college-going students (FGCS) reported significantly lower levels of hope, academic self-efficacy, and academic achievement when compared to non-FGCS. Male students reported significantly lower academic self-efficacy compared to female students. There was no statistically significant difference between non-White and White students. Overall, academic self-efficacy was a stronger predictor of achievement than hope. Between the two subscales of trait hope, agency was more strongly correlated with academic achievement than pathways. Furthermore, a mediation analysis indicated that academic self-efficacy fully accounted for the relationship between agency and academic achievement, which suggests that perceived capacity and agency to perform tasks in a specific domain may be more strongly associated with academic achievement than a general sense of hope and motivation.","PeriodicalId":387459,"journal":{"name":"International Dialogues on Education Journal","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Dialogues on Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53308/ide.v8i1.243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the present study, the relationships among trait hope, academic self-efficacy, and academic achievement (self-reported GPA) were examined among college students. Demographic differences were analyzed based on college-going status, ethnicity, and gender. First-generation college-going students (FGCS) reported significantly lower levels of hope, academic self-efficacy, and academic achievement when compared to non-FGCS. Male students reported significantly lower academic self-efficacy compared to female students. There was no statistically significant difference between non-White and White students. Overall, academic self-efficacy was a stronger predictor of achievement than hope. Between the two subscales of trait hope, agency was more strongly correlated with academic achievement than pathways. Furthermore, a mediation analysis indicated that academic self-efficacy fully accounted for the relationship between agency and academic achievement, which suggests that perceived capacity and agency to perform tasks in a specific domain may be more strongly associated with academic achievement than a general sense of hope and motivation.
大学生学业成就:希望与学业自我效能感的作用探讨
本研究考察了大学生特质希望、学业自我效能感和学业成绩(自报GPA)之间的关系。人口统计学上的差异是根据大学就读状况、种族和性别来分析的。与非FGCS相比,第一代大学生(FGCS)报告的希望、学业自我效能和学业成就水平明显较低。男生的学业自我效能显著低于女生。在非白人学生和白人学生之间没有统计学上的显著差异。总体而言,学业自我效能比希望更能预测成就。在希望特质的两个分量表中,能动性与学业成就的相关性比途径的相关性更强。此外,一项中介分析表明,学业自我效能感完全解释了代理与学业成就之间的关系,这表明在特定领域执行任务的感知能力和代理可能比一般的希望感和动机与学业成就的关系更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信