A Histological Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of the Antidepressant Fluoxetine Versus the Anti-inflammatory Sulfasalazine in Experimentally Induced Colitis in Adult Male Albino Rats

A. Soliman, Dalia F. Kallini, Rania A. Salah El Din, H. A. Abdel Hamid, S. Kamar, Shimaa S. Mohammed
{"title":"A Histological Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of the Antidepressant Fluoxetine Versus the Anti-inflammatory Sulfasalazine in Experimentally Induced Colitis in Adult Male Albino Rats","authors":"A. Soliman, Dalia F. Kallini, Rania A. Salah El Din, H. A. Abdel Hamid, S. Kamar, Shimaa S. Mohammed","doi":"10.21608/ejana.2019.251311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The growing prevalence of the inflammatory bowel diseases in Arab community increases both economic and health care burden. Thus, better and more affordable treatment cure is greatly needed. Aim of the Work: T he goal of work was to study the histological effect of the antidepressant drug (fluoxetine) versus the traditional anti-inflammatory drug (sulfasalazine) on induced colitis in adult male albino rats. Material and Methods: Twenty-four adult male albino rats were randomly divided into four groups, each containing six rats.: group (A) which served as the control group; group (B), in which colitis was induced by intra-rectal administration of 1 ml of 2% acetic acid daily for 3 consecutive days then left without any treatment for 14 days; group (C), in which the rats received sulfasalazine for 14 days after induction of colitis as in group B; and group (D) in which the rats received fluoxetine 14 days after induction of colitis. Both drugs in group (C) and (D) were dissolved in distilled water and administered by oral gavage once daily. At the end of the experiment, distal colon (10 cm proximal to the anus) was removed and processed for light microscopic examination using H & E, combined alcian blue – PAS and Mallory’s trichrome stains. Toluidine blue stain was used for semi-thin sections. Computer image analysis and statistical study were also performed for the number of goblet cells and area percent of collagen fibers content. Results: Colitis induction showed mucosal injury. There was loss of surface epithelium and disruption of crypt architecture. The muscularis mucosae showed vacuolations. Moreover, there were dilated blood vessels in submucosa. Administration of fluoxetine improved the colonic structure especially the surface epithelium while sulfasalazine was by far less efficient in improving induced colitis. Conclusion: Fluoxetine improved the colonic structure and proved to be more effective management of experimentally induced colitis with less adverse effects than the conventional management by sulfasalazine.","PeriodicalId":383073,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Anatomy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejana.2019.251311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The growing prevalence of the inflammatory bowel diseases in Arab community increases both economic and health care burden. Thus, better and more affordable treatment cure is greatly needed. Aim of the Work: T he goal of work was to study the histological effect of the antidepressant drug (fluoxetine) versus the traditional anti-inflammatory drug (sulfasalazine) on induced colitis in adult male albino rats. Material and Methods: Twenty-four adult male albino rats were randomly divided into four groups, each containing six rats.: group (A) which served as the control group; group (B), in which colitis was induced by intra-rectal administration of 1 ml of 2% acetic acid daily for 3 consecutive days then left without any treatment for 14 days; group (C), in which the rats received sulfasalazine for 14 days after induction of colitis as in group B; and group (D) in which the rats received fluoxetine 14 days after induction of colitis. Both drugs in group (C) and (D) were dissolved in distilled water and administered by oral gavage once daily. At the end of the experiment, distal colon (10 cm proximal to the anus) was removed and processed for light microscopic examination using H & E, combined alcian blue – PAS and Mallory’s trichrome stains. Toluidine blue stain was used for semi-thin sections. Computer image analysis and statistical study were also performed for the number of goblet cells and area percent of collagen fibers content. Results: Colitis induction showed mucosal injury. There was loss of surface epithelium and disruption of crypt architecture. The muscularis mucosae showed vacuolations. Moreover, there were dilated blood vessels in submucosa. Administration of fluoxetine improved the colonic structure especially the surface epithelium while sulfasalazine was by far less efficient in improving induced colitis. Conclusion: Fluoxetine improved the colonic structure and proved to be more effective management of experimentally induced colitis with less adverse effects than the conventional management by sulfasalazine.
抗抑郁药氟西汀与抗炎药磺胺氮嗪对成年雄性白化大鼠实验性结肠炎疗效的组织学研究
背景:炎症性肠病在阿拉伯社区的日益流行增加了经济和卫生保健负担。因此,迫切需要更好、更实惠的治疗方法。研究目的:研究抗抑郁药氟西汀与传统抗炎药磺胺氮嗪对成年雄性白化大鼠诱导结肠炎的组织学影响。材料与方法:24只成年雄性白化大鼠随机分为4组,每组6只。: A组,作为对照组;B组,连续3天,每天直肠内灌胃2%醋酸1ml,然后不给药,连续14天;C组,大鼠结肠炎诱导后与B组一样,连续14天服用柳氮磺胺吡啶;D组在结肠炎诱导后14天给予氟西汀治疗。(C)组和(D)组均用蒸馏水溶解,每日1次灌胃。实验结束时,切除结肠远端(肛门近端10cm),用H & E、阿利新蓝- PAS和马洛里三色染色联合进行光镜检查。半薄切片采用甲苯胺蓝染色。并对杯状细胞数量和胶原纤维含量面积百分比进行计算机图像分析和统计研究。结果:结肠炎诱导出现粘膜损伤。表面上皮丢失,隐窝结构破坏。粘膜肌层呈空泡状。粘膜下层血管扩张。氟西汀可改善结肠结构,尤其是表面上皮,而磺胺氮嗪对改善诱导性结肠炎的效果较差。结论:氟西汀改善了实验性结肠炎患者的结肠结构,与常规的磺胺嘧啶治疗相比,氟西汀治疗实验性结肠炎更有效,副作用更小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信