A.S. Khomyakov’s Philosophy of Sobornost: Problem Field and Categorical Structures

S. V. Kornilov
{"title":"A.S. Khomyakov’s Philosophy of Sobornost: Problem Field and Categorical Structures","authors":"S. V. Kornilov","doi":"10.17588/2076-9210.2022.4.021-034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the philosophical concept of the outstanding Russian thinker A.S. Khomyakov (1804–1860). The system method and historical and philosophical reconstruction are used. The categorical structures of its concept are analyzed, the content of the basic category is revealed. The main ideological sources of Khomyakov's worldview are determined. It is argued that the development of categorical structures of the thinker's concept is based on his reflections on the church. It is revealed that in the work “The Church is One” Khomyakov for the first time the concept of sobornost is introduced, having become the fundamental basis of his entire concept. It is proved that the doctrine of sobornost contains the basic principles developed by the philosopher in his ontology and epistemology, historiosophy and social theory. It is shown that in the era of widespread dissemination in Russia of the teachings of German philosophers, A.S. Khomyakov showed himself as a subtle and deep analyst who sharply criticized the results of the development of German theoretical thought. As a result of the carried out textual analysis, the general architecture and logical connections of the categorical structures of the thinker's concept are determined. It is demonstrated that the philosopher does not stop at studying the main directions of contemporary philosophy – he develops his own, original solution to the main problems of ontology and the theory of cognition. The paper analyzes the work of Khomyakov “Notes on world history”, designed to give a holistic understanding of world history, its meaning and direction. It is shown that the concept developed in it to a certain extent was an alternative to the Hegel model of the historical process. The article concludes that the development of categorical structures of the philosophy of sobornost of A.S. Khomyakov retains its importance for modern theoretical thought.","PeriodicalId":445879,"journal":{"name":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2022.4.021-034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article deals with the philosophical concept of the outstanding Russian thinker A.S. Khomyakov (1804–1860). The system method and historical and philosophical reconstruction are used. The categorical structures of its concept are analyzed, the content of the basic category is revealed. The main ideological sources of Khomyakov's worldview are determined. It is argued that the development of categorical structures of the thinker's concept is based on his reflections on the church. It is revealed that in the work “The Church is One” Khomyakov for the first time the concept of sobornost is introduced, having become the fundamental basis of his entire concept. It is proved that the doctrine of sobornost contains the basic principles developed by the philosopher in his ontology and epistemology, historiosophy and social theory. It is shown that in the era of widespread dissemination in Russia of the teachings of German philosophers, A.S. Khomyakov showed himself as a subtle and deep analyst who sharply criticized the results of the development of German theoretical thought. As a result of the carried out textual analysis, the general architecture and logical connections of the categorical structures of the thinker's concept are determined. It is demonstrated that the philosopher does not stop at studying the main directions of contemporary philosophy – he develops his own, original solution to the main problems of ontology and the theory of cognition. The paper analyzes the work of Khomyakov “Notes on world history”, designed to give a holistic understanding of world history, its meaning and direction. It is shown that the concept developed in it to a certain extent was an alternative to the Hegel model of the historical process. The article concludes that the development of categorical structures of the philosophy of sobornost of A.S. Khomyakov retains its importance for modern theoretical thought.
霍米亚科夫的哲学:问题场与范畴结构
本文论述了俄国杰出思想家霍米亚科夫(1804-1860)的哲学思想。采用系统方法和历史哲学重构。分析了其概念的范畴结构,揭示了基本范畴的内容。霍米亚科夫世界观的主要思想来源是确定的。本文认为,思想家概念范畴结构的发展是基于他对教会的反思。据透露,在作品《教会是一体》中,霍米亚科夫首次引入了sobornost的概念,并成为他整个概念的基本基础。事实证明,清明学说包含了这位哲学家在其本体论和认识论、历史哲学和社会理论中发展起来的基本原则。本文表明,在德国哲学家的学说在俄国广泛传播的时代,霍米亚科夫表现出了自己作为一个敏锐而深刻的分析者的形象,他尖锐地批评了德国理论思想发展的结果。通过文本分析,确定了思想者概念范畴结构的总体结构和逻辑联系。事实证明,这位哲学家并没有停留在研究当代哲学的主要方向上,他对本体论和认识论的主要问题提出了自己的、独创的解决方案。本文分析了霍米亚科夫的《世界史札记》,旨在对世界史及其意义和方向有一个整体的认识。这表明,其中发展起来的概念在一定程度上是对黑格尔历史过程模型的一种替代。本文认为,霍米亚科夫的直言哲学范畴结构的发展对现代理论思想仍然具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信