Fecundidade e comportamento reprodutivo em contextos de desastres: aspectos motivacionais ou mecanismos biológicos?

Isac Alves Correia
{"title":"Fecundidade e comportamento reprodutivo em contextos de desastres: aspectos motivacionais ou mecanismos biológicos?","authors":"Isac Alves Correia","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.4432870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relationship between disasters and fertility has aroused the interest demographers and social scientists in general. However, the variation in the direction of the results for different contexts, scales (macro and micro) and levels (households, individuals, etc.) highlights the need to bring these experiences together to guide the conduct of future investigations. Throught a systematic literature review, the main objective of this paper is to highlight the advances in research on fertility and reproductive behavior in response to disasters. The literature has shown differences results and conflicting justifications for the association between fertility and reproductive behavior in response to disasters that, to some extent, occur due to the diversity of disciplinary approaches and the lack of qualitative studies or with mixed methodologies (quali-quanti). There are still gaps in the direction of relationships and the mechanisms that justify them, whether by deliberate family decisions, impacts on health services or physiological issues. Latin American Region may make fertile contributions for debate due to the various disasters such as droughts, dam disruptions and the Zika Virus epidemic in Brazil, as well as conflicts and unstable situations in Colombia, Argentina and Chile.","PeriodicalId":231740,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espinhaço","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espinhaço","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4432870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationship between disasters and fertility has aroused the interest demographers and social scientists in general. However, the variation in the direction of the results for different contexts, scales (macro and micro) and levels (households, individuals, etc.) highlights the need to bring these experiences together to guide the conduct of future investigations. Throught a systematic literature review, the main objective of this paper is to highlight the advances in research on fertility and reproductive behavior in response to disasters. The literature has shown differences results and conflicting justifications for the association between fertility and reproductive behavior in response to disasters that, to some extent, occur due to the diversity of disciplinary approaches and the lack of qualitative studies or with mixed methodologies (quali-quanti). There are still gaps in the direction of relationships and the mechanisms that justify them, whether by deliberate family decisions, impacts on health services or physiological issues. Latin American Region may make fertile contributions for debate due to the various disasters such as droughts, dam disruptions and the Zika Virus epidemic in Brazil, as well as conflicts and unstable situations in Colombia, Argentina and Chile.
灾害背景下的生育和生殖行为:动机方面还是生物机制?
灾害与生育之间的关系引起了人口学家和社会科学家的普遍兴趣。然而,不同背景、尺度(宏观和微观)和水平(家庭、个人等)的结果方向存在差异,这突出表明需要将这些经验结合起来,以指导未来调查的开展。通过系统的文献综述,本文的主要目的是突出生殖和生殖行为在应对灾害方面的研究进展。文献表明,在某种程度上,由于学科方法的多样性和缺乏定性研究或混合方法(质-量)而导致的灾害反应中生育率和生殖行为之间的联系存在差异结果和相互矛盾的理由。在关系的方向和证明其合理性的机制方面,无论是通过蓄意的家庭决定、对保健服务的影响还是生理问题,仍然存在差距。由于巴西的干旱、大坝破坏和寨卡病毒流行等各种灾害,以及哥伦比亚、阿根廷和智利的冲突和不稳定局势,拉丁美洲地区可能会为辩论提供丰富的资料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信