The Firm as an Entity: Management, Organization, Accounting

Y. Biondi
{"title":"The Firm as an Entity: Management, Organization, Accounting","authors":"Y. Biondi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.774764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Why delve into accounting to understand the economic nature of the firm? A Coase's recent suggestion calls economic organization and accounting system at issue for understanding how the special economics of the firm supersedes price system in creating and allocating resources. But incomplete contracts economics has no clear theorizing of these functional modes of existence constituting the firm as a whole (constituents), surely in reason of its methodological contractualism. Starting from Coase, Shubik and Simon, instead, this paper aims at further developing this issue, exploring the accounting system, its nature and role in the special economics of the firm concerned with real dynamics and complexity. By means of the accounting system dealing with the business incomes to the firm, the economic and monetary process generated by the whole firm acquires autonomous but interdependent existence from external markets (both from factors or products markets). The accounting system constitutes thus the \"veil\" that allows this special process to exist. Not only the real dynamics, but also the separation between ownership, control and management (as early discussed by Berle and Littleton) asks for the entity view on the firm provided by dynamic accounting. Even to protect shareholders, this kind of accountability is required, far away from the irrevocably lost proprietary sovereignty. In this accounting-friendly transactional and institutional perspective, the firm entity functions and exists as a managed dynamic system characterized by different structures of production, institutional, organizational, or epistemic (related to the nature and role of institutions, internal organization, and knowledge in the firm). Accounting system becomes a constituent part of these structures and of the whole firm. This new perspective opens to an interdisciplinary approach linking Economics, Accounting, and Law by the shared, synthetic notion of the firm as an entity, which provides the \"clue\" for understanding the nature of the firm as a whole.","PeriodicalId":122698,"journal":{"name":"Micro: Organizational Behavior (Topic)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"47","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Micro: Organizational Behavior (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.774764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

Abstract

Why delve into accounting to understand the economic nature of the firm? A Coase's recent suggestion calls economic organization and accounting system at issue for understanding how the special economics of the firm supersedes price system in creating and allocating resources. But incomplete contracts economics has no clear theorizing of these functional modes of existence constituting the firm as a whole (constituents), surely in reason of its methodological contractualism. Starting from Coase, Shubik and Simon, instead, this paper aims at further developing this issue, exploring the accounting system, its nature and role in the special economics of the firm concerned with real dynamics and complexity. By means of the accounting system dealing with the business incomes to the firm, the economic and monetary process generated by the whole firm acquires autonomous but interdependent existence from external markets (both from factors or products markets). The accounting system constitutes thus the "veil" that allows this special process to exist. Not only the real dynamics, but also the separation between ownership, control and management (as early discussed by Berle and Littleton) asks for the entity view on the firm provided by dynamic accounting. Even to protect shareholders, this kind of accountability is required, far away from the irrevocably lost proprietary sovereignty. In this accounting-friendly transactional and institutional perspective, the firm entity functions and exists as a managed dynamic system characterized by different structures of production, institutional, organizational, or epistemic (related to the nature and role of institutions, internal organization, and knowledge in the firm). Accounting system becomes a constituent part of these structures and of the whole firm. This new perspective opens to an interdisciplinary approach linking Economics, Accounting, and Law by the shared, synthetic notion of the firm as an entity, which provides the "clue" for understanding the nature of the firm as a whole.
公司作为一个实体:管理、组织、会计
为什么要钻研会计来了解公司的经济性质?科斯最近提出,为了理解企业的特殊经济学如何在创造和分配资源方面取代价格体系,经济组织和会计体系是有争议的。但是,由于方法论上的契约主义,不完全契约经济学对这些构成企业整体(组成部分)的存在功能模式没有明确的理论化。从科斯、舒比克和西蒙开始,本文旨在进一步发展这一问题,探讨会计制度,它的性质和作用,在企业的特殊经济学中,关注真正的动态和复杂性。通过会计系统处理企业的业务收入,整个企业产生的经济和货币过程从外部市场(从要素市场或产品市场)获得了自主但相互依存的存在。因此,会计制度构成了允许这一特殊过程存在的“面纱”。不仅是真实的动态,而且所有权、控制权和管理层之间的分离(正如Berle和Littleton早先讨论的那样)要求动态会计提供对公司的实体观点。即使是为了保护股东,也需要这种问责制,远离不可挽回的所有权主权。在这种对会计友好的交易和制度的观点中,企业实体作为一个受管理的动态系统运行和存在,其特征是不同的生产结构、制度结构、组织结构或知识结构(与制度、内部组织和企业知识的性质和作用有关)。会计系统成为这些结构和整个公司的组成部分。这种新的视角打开了一种跨学科的方法,通过企业作为一个实体的共享的、综合的概念,将经济学、会计和法律联系起来,这为理解企业作为一个整体的性质提供了“线索”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信