An evaluation scheme for hierarchical information browsing structures

M. Richardson
{"title":"An evaluation scheme for hierarchical information browsing structures","authors":"M. Richardson","doi":"10.1145/1358628.1358916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is no widely accepted means of evaluating category systems for information search and browsing. This presentation outlines an evaluation scheme and an evaluation method that applies the scheme. The scheme delineates features broadly classified under comprehensiveness, coherence, and correctness. The method evaluates the category system through a survey distributed among subject domain experts. The method requires minimal resources, is easily conducted remotely, and is easily modified. The approach finds the over- and under-sensitivities of the method of generating the system. A case study has demonstrated the usefulness of the approach, and the inter-rater reliability found suggests that the evaluation scheme is meaningful.","PeriodicalId":310204,"journal":{"name":"CHI '08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHI '08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1358628.1358916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is no widely accepted means of evaluating category systems for information search and browsing. This presentation outlines an evaluation scheme and an evaluation method that applies the scheme. The scheme delineates features broadly classified under comprehensiveness, coherence, and correctness. The method evaluates the category system through a survey distributed among subject domain experts. The method requires minimal resources, is easily conducted remotely, and is easily modified. The approach finds the over- and under-sensitivities of the method of generating the system. A case study has demonstrated the usefulness of the approach, and the inter-rater reliability found suggests that the evaluation scheme is meaningful.
分层信息浏览结构的评估方案
目前还没有一种被广泛接受的方法来评估信息搜索和浏览的分类系统。本报告概述了一个评估方案和应用该方案的评估方法。该方案划定的特征大致分为全面性、连贯性和正确性。该方法通过对学科领域专家进行调查来评估分类系统。该方法所需资源极少,易于远程进行,且易于修改。该方法可以发现系统生成方法的过度敏感和不足敏感性。一项案例研究证明了这一方法的实用性,所发现的评分者之间的可靠性也表明这一评估方案是有意义的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信