THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING JIGSAW STRATEGY IN COMPARISON TO TRADITIONAL LECTURING IN ENHANCING READING COMPREHENSION SKILLS OF SAUDI EFL LEARNERS

Mustafa Mohammed Sadek Elsayed
{"title":"THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING JIGSAW STRATEGY IN COMPARISON TO TRADITIONAL LECTURING IN ENHANCING READING COMPREHENSION SKILLS OF SAUDI EFL LEARNERS","authors":"Mustafa Mohammed Sadek Elsayed","doi":"10.47696/adved.202216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This experimental study aims to investigate the effectiveness of using Jigsaw strategy in comparison to traditional lecturing in enhancing ICP EFL students’ reading comprehension skills. The experiment was conducted in an ICP EFL reading comprehension course, a five credit course, with five hours of instruction per week, over the first semester of 2021-2022 academic year. Forty ICP EFL students of Sciences and Arts College taking EFL reading comprehension course took part in this study, with 20 students in the experimental group and 20 in the control group. The experimental group received a Jigsaw strategy instruction, whereas the control group received a traditional lecturing instruction. The sole instrument used in this study was an identical pre-post EFL reading comprehension test. Both of the experimental and control groups were administered pre and post EFL reading comprehension tests. The pre- and post- scores from the EFL reading comprehension tests were calculated for descriptive statistics and compared using a t Test. The findings of the study indicated that there were statistically significant differences in favor of the effectiveness of using Jigsaw strategy instruction in enhancing ICP EFL students’ reading comprehension skills. The students’ scores in EFL reading comprehension were higher for the post-test than the pre-test after being subject to Jigsaw strategy instruction. Most literature published on using cooperative learning strategies in the Saudi higher education context did not focus on using Jigsaw strategy in teaching EFL reading comprehension for ICP EFL students. To the best of the researcher’s knowledge, this is the first paper to investigate the effectiveness of using Jigsaw strategy in teaching EFL reading comprehension for secondary school leavers without prior experience with cooperative learning strategies like ICP EFL students. In conclusion, EFL reading comprehension instructors are highly recommended to use Jigsaw strategy instruction in EFL reading comprehension courses.","PeriodicalId":127423,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of ADVED 2022- 8th International Conference on Advances in Education","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of ADVED 2022- 8th International Conference on Advances in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47696/adved.202216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This experimental study aims to investigate the effectiveness of using Jigsaw strategy in comparison to traditional lecturing in enhancing ICP EFL students’ reading comprehension skills. The experiment was conducted in an ICP EFL reading comprehension course, a five credit course, with five hours of instruction per week, over the first semester of 2021-2022 academic year. Forty ICP EFL students of Sciences and Arts College taking EFL reading comprehension course took part in this study, with 20 students in the experimental group and 20 in the control group. The experimental group received a Jigsaw strategy instruction, whereas the control group received a traditional lecturing instruction. The sole instrument used in this study was an identical pre-post EFL reading comprehension test. Both of the experimental and control groups were administered pre and post EFL reading comprehension tests. The pre- and post- scores from the EFL reading comprehension tests were calculated for descriptive statistics and compared using a t Test. The findings of the study indicated that there were statistically significant differences in favor of the effectiveness of using Jigsaw strategy instruction in enhancing ICP EFL students’ reading comprehension skills. The students’ scores in EFL reading comprehension were higher for the post-test than the pre-test after being subject to Jigsaw strategy instruction. Most literature published on using cooperative learning strategies in the Saudi higher education context did not focus on using Jigsaw strategy in teaching EFL reading comprehension for ICP EFL students. To the best of the researcher’s knowledge, this is the first paper to investigate the effectiveness of using Jigsaw strategy in teaching EFL reading comprehension for secondary school leavers without prior experience with cooperative learning strategies like ICP EFL students. In conclusion, EFL reading comprehension instructors are highly recommended to use Jigsaw strategy instruction in EFL reading comprehension courses.
与传统课堂教学相比,使用拼图策略提高沙特英语学习者阅读理解能力的有效性
本实验旨在探讨运用拼图策略与传统教学相比较,在提高ICP英语学生阅读理解能力方面的效果。该实验是在ICP的英语阅读理解课程中进行的,这是一门五学分的课程,每周授课五小时,于2021-2022学年的第一学期进行。本研究以40名文理学院ICP英语阅读理解班学生为研究对象,实验组20名,对照组20名。实验组接受拼图策略教学,对照组接受传统的讲课教学。本研究使用的唯一工具是一个相同的英语阅读理解前-后测试。实验组和对照组均进行英语阅读理解测试。英语阅读理解测试的前后得分采用描述性统计方法计算,并采用t检验进行比较。研究结果表明,拼图策略教学在提高ICP英语学生阅读理解能力方面存在显著的统计学差异。拼图策略教学后,学生的英语阅读理解成绩明显高于前测。大多数关于在沙特高等教育背景下使用合作学习策略的文献并没有关注在ICP学生的英语阅读理解教学中使用拼图策略。据研究人员所知,这是第一篇研究使用拼图策略对没有合作学习策略经验的中学毕业生(如ICP英语学生)进行英语阅读理解教学有效性的论文。综上所述,我们强烈建议英语阅读理解教师在英语阅读理解课程中使用拼图策略教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信