Urbanism Beyond Cognition: On Design and Machine Learning

R. Bottazzi
{"title":"Urbanism Beyond Cognition: On Design and Machine Learning","authors":"R. Bottazzi","doi":"10.29117/gsm4q.2019.0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It could be argued that the introduction of new technologies always shifts the 'epistemological horizon' of the different fields they impact. New instruments allow expanding the range of parameters defining a discipline's working methods which in turn change their very definition. Design is no exception: for instance, the promises delivered by increases in data collection capacity and early computers helped Buckminster Fuller to redefine design as a planetary activity operating over large timeframes. Today the massive data storing capacities and the improvements on machine learning algorithms to mine them represent the latest development in this long series of epistemological turns. Though little design work has been occurring in this area, there is already an implicit emphasis on efficiency, which may hinder the development of more conceptual and cultural aspects of automated design. The paper will unravel such issues by discussing the design experiments carried out in the Master in Urban Design at the Bartlett, as way to expand conversations between automation, architecture, and design. Particularly, the emphasis will be on how machine-learning algorithms open design up to spatial elements that either are beyond human perception or currently downplayed in the design process. From climate change to rapid urbanization, the speed and scale of urban transformations call for an expanded conceptual framework in which automated design processes allow us to question received classifications based on type, programme, etc., pushing the design towards more complex, fluid, open, incomplete, and embracing urban proposals.","PeriodicalId":201636,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on GSM4Q: Game Set and Match IV 2019 Qatar connecting people spaces machines","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on GSM4Q: Game Set and Match IV 2019 Qatar connecting people spaces machines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29117/gsm4q.2019.0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It could be argued that the introduction of new technologies always shifts the 'epistemological horizon' of the different fields they impact. New instruments allow expanding the range of parameters defining a discipline's working methods which in turn change their very definition. Design is no exception: for instance, the promises delivered by increases in data collection capacity and early computers helped Buckminster Fuller to redefine design as a planetary activity operating over large timeframes. Today the massive data storing capacities and the improvements on machine learning algorithms to mine them represent the latest development in this long series of epistemological turns. Though little design work has been occurring in this area, there is already an implicit emphasis on efficiency, which may hinder the development of more conceptual and cultural aspects of automated design. The paper will unravel such issues by discussing the design experiments carried out in the Master in Urban Design at the Bartlett, as way to expand conversations between automation, architecture, and design. Particularly, the emphasis will be on how machine-learning algorithms open design up to spatial elements that either are beyond human perception or currently downplayed in the design process. From climate change to rapid urbanization, the speed and scale of urban transformations call for an expanded conceptual framework in which automated design processes allow us to question received classifications based on type, programme, etc., pushing the design towards more complex, fluid, open, incomplete, and embracing urban proposals.
超越认知的城市主义:论设计与机器学习
可以说,新技术的引入总是会改变它们所影响的不同领域的“认识论视界”。新的工具允许扩展定义学科工作方法的参数范围,这反过来又改变了它们的定义。设计也不例外:例如,数据收集能力的提高和早期计算机所带来的希望,帮助巴克明斯特·富勒(Buckminster Fuller)将设计重新定义为一种在大时间框架内运行的行星活动。今天,海量数据存储能力和机器学习算法的改进代表了这一系列认识论转折的最新发展。虽然在这个领域很少有设计工作发生,但已经有一个隐含的强调效率,这可能会阻碍自动化设计的更多概念和文化方面的发展。本文将通过讨论巴特利特大学城市设计硕士课程中进行的设计实验来揭示这些问题,以此来扩展自动化、建筑和设计之间的对话。特别是,重点将放在机器学习算法如何将设计开放给超出人类感知或目前在设计过程中被淡化的空间元素。从气候变化到快速城市化,城市转型的速度和规模需要一个扩展的概念框架,在这个框架中,自动化设计过程允许我们质疑基于类型、程序等的现有分类,将设计推向更复杂、流动、开放、不完整,并拥抱城市建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信