Game theory application for determining wheeling charges

K. Lo, C.A. Lozano, J.M. Gers O
{"title":"Game theory application for determining wheeling charges","authors":"K. Lo, C.A. Lozano, J.M. Gers O","doi":"10.1109/DRPT.2000.855682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emergence of open trading in electrical markets has led to the unbundling of services traditionally supplied by integrated electricity utilities (generation, transmission and distribution). Transmission open access regulations establish that all the electrical market participants have the same rights to use the transmission facilities in the same conditions and only subject to operational restrictions (security levels, congestion, etc.). On the other hand, the transmission network users are responsible for the costs incurred for the wheeler in order to accommodate the transactions. However, how to charge the users for the transmission facilities in a fair way is still a problem to be properly resolved. A concomitant problem is how to define the fairness criteria to charge the users for these facilities. To deal with this problem, methodologies involving the application of game theory are studied. In competitive electricity markets, the participants need assistance on how to make decisions and with whom to form coalitions to optimise their costs. In this paper, two solution concepts of the cooperative game theory are introduced: the nucleolus and the Shapley value.","PeriodicalId":127287,"journal":{"name":"DRPT2000. International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies. Proceedings (Cat. No.00EX382)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DRPT2000. International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies. Proceedings (Cat. No.00EX382)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DRPT.2000.855682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The emergence of open trading in electrical markets has led to the unbundling of services traditionally supplied by integrated electricity utilities (generation, transmission and distribution). Transmission open access regulations establish that all the electrical market participants have the same rights to use the transmission facilities in the same conditions and only subject to operational restrictions (security levels, congestion, etc.). On the other hand, the transmission network users are responsible for the costs incurred for the wheeler in order to accommodate the transactions. However, how to charge the users for the transmission facilities in a fair way is still a problem to be properly resolved. A concomitant problem is how to define the fairness criteria to charge the users for these facilities. To deal with this problem, methodologies involving the application of game theory are studied. In competitive electricity markets, the participants need assistance on how to make decisions and with whom to form coalitions to optimise their costs. In this paper, two solution concepts of the cooperative game theory are introduced: the nucleolus and the Shapley value.
确定轮盘收费的博弈论应用
电力市场开放交易的出现导致了传统上由综合电力公用事业(发电、输电和配电)提供的服务的分离。输电开放接入条例规定,所有电力市场参与者在相同的条件下拥有相同的使用输电设施的权利,并且只受运营限制(安全级别、拥塞等)。另一方面,输电网络用户要承担运维者为适应交易而产生的成本。然而,如何公平地向用户收取传输设施的费用仍然是一个需要妥善解决的问题。随之而来的一个问题是如何定义对这些设施的用户收费的公平标准。为了解决这个问题,我们研究了博弈论的应用方法。在竞争激烈的电力市场中,参与者需要在如何决策以及与谁组成联盟以优化成本方面获得帮助。本文引入了合作博弈论的两个解概念:核仁和Shapley值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信