{"title":"“Everything Originates from the Oral Traditions”: A Close Reading of Cook-Lynn’s Aurelia: A Crow Creek Trilogy","authors":"S. Hernandez","doi":"10.1353/wic.2019.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Over the past forty years, Dakota writer and scholar Elizabeth Cook-Lynn has published numerous books and articles that are foundational to Native American studies. Although much of Cook-Lynn’s scholarship focuses upon Native politics, law, and history, this article examines her often underappreciated, undervalued contributions to Native literature. In this article, I provide a close reading of Cook-Lynn’s 1999 book Aurelia: A Crow Creek Trilogy, a collection of three novellas that quickly fell out-of-print after early literary critics dismissed it as too political and unrealistic. Indeed, Cook-Lynn’s trilogy is unapologetically political as she exposes the devastating effects of settler colonialism. However, I argue that early literary critics, who bristled at these accusations, also seemed to misinterpret this trilogy because they failed to acknowledge that it is firmly grounded in the Dakota literary tradition. Aurelia is a contemporary retelling of two traditional Dakota oral stories (o-hun-ka-ka tales) about the Corn Wife and the sacred river that remind contemporary Dakota people about their connection and responsibility to the land and each other. In this close reading, I explicate the content, style, and structure of these three novellas to show how Cook-Lynn re-imagines the Dakota oral tradition in a more modern form as print literature.","PeriodicalId":343767,"journal":{"name":"Wicazo Sa Review","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wicazo Sa Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wic.2019.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract:Over the past forty years, Dakota writer and scholar Elizabeth Cook-Lynn has published numerous books and articles that are foundational to Native American studies. Although much of Cook-Lynn’s scholarship focuses upon Native politics, law, and history, this article examines her often underappreciated, undervalued contributions to Native literature. In this article, I provide a close reading of Cook-Lynn’s 1999 book Aurelia: A Crow Creek Trilogy, a collection of three novellas that quickly fell out-of-print after early literary critics dismissed it as too political and unrealistic. Indeed, Cook-Lynn’s trilogy is unapologetically political as she exposes the devastating effects of settler colonialism. However, I argue that early literary critics, who bristled at these accusations, also seemed to misinterpret this trilogy because they failed to acknowledge that it is firmly grounded in the Dakota literary tradition. Aurelia is a contemporary retelling of two traditional Dakota oral stories (o-hun-ka-ka tales) about the Corn Wife and the sacred river that remind contemporary Dakota people about their connection and responsibility to the land and each other. In this close reading, I explicate the content, style, and structure of these three novellas to show how Cook-Lynn re-imagines the Dakota oral tradition in a more modern form as print literature.
摘要:在过去的四十年里,达科他作家和学者伊丽莎白·库克-林恩出版了大量的书籍和文章,这些书籍和文章对美国原住民研究具有基础意义。虽然库克-林恩的大部分学术研究都集中在土著政治、法律和历史上,但这篇文章考察了她对土著文学的贡献,这些贡献往往被低估。在这篇文章中,我仔细阅读了库克-林恩1999年出版的《奥蕾莉亚:鸦溪三部曲》(Aurelia: a Crow Creek Trilogy),这是一本由三篇中篇小说组成的小说集,在早期文学评论家认为它过于政治化和不切实际后,很快就绝版了。事实上,库克-林恩的三部曲在揭露殖民者殖民主义的破坏性影响时,毫不掩饰地带有政治色彩。然而,我认为,早期的文学评论家们对这些指责感到愤怒,似乎也误解了这部三部曲,因为他们没有认识到它是牢牢扎根于达科塔文学传统的。《奥蕾莉亚》是当代对两个达科他传统口头故事(o- hunk -ka-ka -ka tales)的复述,讲述了玉米妻子和圣河的故事,提醒了当代达科他人与土地和彼此的联系和责任。在这篇细读中,我解释了这三篇中篇小说的内容、风格和结构,以展示库克-林恩如何以一种更现代的印刷文学形式重新想象达科塔口头传统。