Reading and (Re)Writing the Auctores: Poliziano and the Ancient Roman Miscellany

Scott DiGiulio
{"title":"Reading and (Re)Writing the Auctores: Poliziano and the Ancient Roman Miscellany","authors":"Scott DiGiulio","doi":"10.21825/jolcel.vi4.16470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay examins the influence of Aulus Gellius' Noctes Atticae (2nd c. CE) on Angelo Poliziano's Miscellaneorum centuria prima (1489); in particular, it reconsiders that manner in which the aesthetics of varietas are deployed in each as part of the broader literary program. First, by exploring ideas of auctoritas, this essay suggests that Gellius' own preferred categories influenced Poliziano's sense of the canon and contributed to the development of his own authoritative persona throughouth Preface of the centuria prima. Second, in examining the ways in which both authors describe their use of literary diversity, it becomes increasingly evident that both see their prose works as operating within a broader aesthetic of variety. After illustrating how both authors  articulate these values, the essay concludes by examining two sets of chapters in the Centuria prima in which variety is put to use for didactic purpose, in a manner similar to the Noctes Atticae. While the influence of Gellius has long been acknowledged, including by Poliziano himself, this essay offers a reading of each author that reveals additional literary purpose underlying their use of the aesthetics of variety.","PeriodicalId":421554,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Latin Cosmopolitanism and European Literatures","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Latin Cosmopolitanism and European Literatures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21825/jolcel.vi4.16470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay examins the influence of Aulus Gellius' Noctes Atticae (2nd c. CE) on Angelo Poliziano's Miscellaneorum centuria prima (1489); in particular, it reconsiders that manner in which the aesthetics of varietas are deployed in each as part of the broader literary program. First, by exploring ideas of auctoritas, this essay suggests that Gellius' own preferred categories influenced Poliziano's sense of the canon and contributed to the development of his own authoritative persona throughouth Preface of the centuria prima. Second, in examining the ways in which both authors describe their use of literary diversity, it becomes increasingly evident that both see their prose works as operating within a broader aesthetic of variety. After illustrating how both authors  articulate these values, the essay concludes by examining two sets of chapters in the Centuria prima in which variety is put to use for didactic purpose, in a manner similar to the Noctes Atticae. While the influence of Gellius has long been acknowledged, including by Poliziano himself, this essay offers a reading of each author that reveals additional literary purpose underlying their use of the aesthetics of variety.
阅读和(再)写作作者:波利齐亚诺和古罗马杂记
本文考察了奥勒斯·格里乌斯的《札记》(公元2世纪)对安杰洛·波利齐亚诺的《世纪初杂记》(1489)的影响;特别地,它重新考虑了作为更广泛的文学计划的一部分,各种美学在每种中被部署的方式。首先,通过对权威主义思想的探索,本文认为盖里乌斯自己偏爱的范畴影响了波利齐亚诺对正典的认识,并通过《第一世纪序言》促进了他自己权威人格的发展。其次,在研究两位作者描述他们使用文学多样性的方式时,越来越明显的是,他们都把自己的散文作品看作是在更广泛的审美多样性中运作的。在说明了两位作者如何阐明这些价值观之后,文章通过检查《百岁》中两组章节来总结,其中多样性被用于教学目的,以一种类似于《注释》的方式。虽然格里乌斯的影响早已得到承认,包括波利齐亚诺本人,但这篇文章提供了对每位作者的阅读,揭示了他们使用多样性美学的额外文学目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信