{"title":"TECHNOLOGICAL COMPETENCE OF HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENTS AS A PROBLEM OF PEDAGOGICAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE","authors":"I. Buhun, L. Kravchenko","doi":"10.33989/2519-8254.2020.7.238050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article on the basis of competence and technological scientific approaches considers the understanding of technological competence of higher education students in the domestic pedagogical science and practice. Attention is focused on the idea of comparing pedagogical processes with production ones in the works of Ya.A. Comenius, A. Makarenko, famous Ukrainian (A. Aleksyuk, V. Bondar, I. Zyazyuna, V. Loza, I. Pidlasy, etc.) and foreign (B. Bloom, M. Woolman, M. Clark, P. Mitchell , R. Thomas and others). The main provisions of the competence scientific approach (O. Guzman, G. Selevko, O. Savchenko, V. Serikov, I. Khutorsky, etc.) are emphasized, which emphasize the technological component of professional competence of specialists of different qualifications. \nIn the content of technological competence of higher education students there are two blocks (block of knowledge - methodological-theoretical, information-content, methodical, technological, creative; block of techniques - a set of different methods and techniques of human interaction with equipment, machines and other tools that determine the ability to design and design new technologies, the development of creative abilities of the specialist). \nA distinction is made between the concepts of \"pedagogical technology\" (contains operational and operational and procedural components of teacher or teacher competence) and \"production technology\" (is a system of creative and technological knowledge, abilities and stereotypes of instrumentalized activities to create or transform objects of reality into selected professional field). \nThe experience of defining the concept of \"technological competence of a specialist\" in the main meanings is systematized: 1) communication technology, interaction technology, technology of organization of individual activity; 2) traditional learning technology, which means the use of methods, tools and forms; 3) the focus of the specialist on achieving the planned result (set and sequence of methods and processes for the implementation of the project product or work). In the context of this, the understanding of technological competence of higher education seekers as an integrated personality trait containing knowledge, technological skills, creative and technological abilities, technological reflection on the leading processes of professional activity and creativity is chosen.","PeriodicalId":130848,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian professional education","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian professional education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33989/2519-8254.2020.7.238050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article on the basis of competence and technological scientific approaches considers the understanding of technological competence of higher education students in the domestic pedagogical science and practice. Attention is focused on the idea of comparing pedagogical processes with production ones in the works of Ya.A. Comenius, A. Makarenko, famous Ukrainian (A. Aleksyuk, V. Bondar, I. Zyazyuna, V. Loza, I. Pidlasy, etc.) and foreign (B. Bloom, M. Woolman, M. Clark, P. Mitchell , R. Thomas and others). The main provisions of the competence scientific approach (O. Guzman, G. Selevko, O. Savchenko, V. Serikov, I. Khutorsky, etc.) are emphasized, which emphasize the technological component of professional competence of specialists of different qualifications.
In the content of technological competence of higher education students there are two blocks (block of knowledge - methodological-theoretical, information-content, methodical, technological, creative; block of techniques - a set of different methods and techniques of human interaction with equipment, machines and other tools that determine the ability to design and design new technologies, the development of creative abilities of the specialist).
A distinction is made between the concepts of "pedagogical technology" (contains operational and operational and procedural components of teacher or teacher competence) and "production technology" (is a system of creative and technological knowledge, abilities and stereotypes of instrumentalized activities to create or transform objects of reality into selected professional field).
The experience of defining the concept of "technological competence of a specialist" in the main meanings is systematized: 1) communication technology, interaction technology, technology of organization of individual activity; 2) traditional learning technology, which means the use of methods, tools and forms; 3) the focus of the specialist on achieving the planned result (set and sequence of methods and processes for the implementation of the project product or work). In the context of this, the understanding of technological competence of higher education seekers as an integrated personality trait containing knowledge, technological skills, creative and technological abilities, technological reflection on the leading processes of professional activity and creativity is chosen.
本文从能力观和技术科学观的角度,对国内教育科学和实践中对高等教育学生技术能力的认识进行了思考。在雅雅的作品中,人们关注的是比较教学过程和生产过程的想法。著名的乌克兰人(A. Aleksyuk、V. Bondar、I. Zyazyuna、V. Loza、I. Pidlasy等)和外国人(B. Bloom、M. Woolman、M. Clark、P. Mitchell、R. Thomas等)。强调能力科学方法(O. Guzman, G. Selevko, O. Savchenko, V. Serikov, I. Khutorsky等)的主要规定,强调不同资格的专家的专业能力的技术组成部分。在高等教育学生技术能力的内容中有两个块(知识块-方法论-理论性、信息性、方法论、技术性、创造性;技术块-人类与设备,机器和其他工具互动的一套不同的方法和技术,决定了设计和设计新技术的能力,专家的创造能力的发展)。在“教学技术”(包括教师或教师能力的操作、操作和程序组成部分)和“生产技术”(是创造和技术知识、能力和工具化活动的定型系统,以创造或将现实对象转化为选定的专业领域)这两个概念之间作出了区分。界定“专家技术能力”概念的经验主要有:1)通信技术、交互技术、组织个体活动的技术;2)传统学习技术,即使用方法、工具和形式;3)专家对实现计划结果的关注(实施项目产品或工作的方法和过程的集合和顺序)。在此背景下,选择将高等教育求职者的技术能力理解为包含知识、技术技能、创造力和技术能力、对专业活动和创造力主导过程的技术反思的综合人格特质。