Adaptation of Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) for assessments in podiatry

Keri M Moore, B. Vaughan, P. Butterworth
{"title":"Adaptation of Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) for assessments in podiatry","authors":"Keri M Moore, B. Vaughan, P. Butterworth","doi":"10.11157/FOHPE.V19I1.198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) is a workplace-based assessment tool widely used in medicine to assess a learner’s ability to execute a technical skill. The aim of this paper is to report on the development phase of the adaptation of the DOPS for the assessment of podiatry learners’ procedural skills. Podiatry learners are required to practise and demonstrate a variety of procedural skills in the management of foot complaints. Such skills include the use of scalpel blades, needles and local anaesthetic applied to a variety of disorders. The DOPS provides an avenue by which a learner’s procedural skills can be assessed and timely feedback provided in the workplace or in simulated environments. Methods: The DOPS was initially adapted for podiatry by a faculty team consisting of a podiatry educator, a clinical education specialist and a clinical educator from another allied health discipline. The first iteration was circulated among podiatry faculty at three other Australian universities. The second iteration was reviewed by clinical supervisors from Southern Cross University (SCU). The third iteration was administered by two clinical supervisors at SCU working with 12 learners during real-time clinical events. Eleven learners used DOPS to assess their peers during five real-time and six simulated learning events. Results: A new tool, the Direct Observation of Procedural Skills in Podiatry (DOPS-P) has emerged from this process. Face and construct validity have been confirmed, and faculty and students consider DOPS-P contributes to learning. Conclusions: Further research is necessary to confirm the validity and reliability of the DOPS-P to support assessment decisions about students’ achievement of podiatry competencies.","PeriodicalId":306686,"journal":{"name":"Focus on health professional education : a multi-disciplinary journal","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Focus on health professional education : a multi-disciplinary journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11157/FOHPE.V19I1.198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) is a workplace-based assessment tool widely used in medicine to assess a learner’s ability to execute a technical skill. The aim of this paper is to report on the development phase of the adaptation of the DOPS for the assessment of podiatry learners’ procedural skills. Podiatry learners are required to practise and demonstrate a variety of procedural skills in the management of foot complaints. Such skills include the use of scalpel blades, needles and local anaesthetic applied to a variety of disorders. The DOPS provides an avenue by which a learner’s procedural skills can be assessed and timely feedback provided in the workplace or in simulated environments. Methods: The DOPS was initially adapted for podiatry by a faculty team consisting of a podiatry educator, a clinical education specialist and a clinical educator from another allied health discipline. The first iteration was circulated among podiatry faculty at three other Australian universities. The second iteration was reviewed by clinical supervisors from Southern Cross University (SCU). The third iteration was administered by two clinical supervisors at SCU working with 12 learners during real-time clinical events. Eleven learners used DOPS to assess their peers during five real-time and six simulated learning events. Results: A new tool, the Direct Observation of Procedural Skills in Podiatry (DOPS-P) has emerged from this process. Face and construct validity have been confirmed, and faculty and students consider DOPS-P contributes to learning. Conclusions: Further research is necessary to confirm the validity and reliability of the DOPS-P to support assessment decisions about students’ achievement of podiatry competencies.
程序性技能直接观察(DOPS)在足病评估中的适应性
背景:程序技能直接观察(DOPS)是一种基于工作场所的评估工具,广泛用于医学评估学习者执行技术技能的能力。本文的目的是报告DOPS适应足病学习者程序技能评估的发展阶段。足病学习者需要实践和演示各种程序技能在足部投诉的管理。这些技能包括使用手术刀刀片、针头和适用于各种疾病的局部麻醉。DOPS为在工作场所或模拟环境中评估学习者的程序性技能并提供及时反馈提供了途径。方法:由一名足病教育者、一名临床教育专家和一名来自其他相关卫生学科的临床教育者组成的教师团队最初将DOPS应用于足病。第一次迭代在其他三所澳大利亚大学的足病教师中流传。第二次迭代由南十字星大学(SCU)的临床导师进行审查。第三次迭代由SCU的两名临床督导管理,在实时临床事件中与12名学习者一起工作。11名学习者在5个实时学习事件和6个模拟学习事件中使用DOPS评估他们的同伴。结果:由此产生了一种新的工具——足部程序性技能直接观察(DOPS-P)。面孔效度和构念效度已被证实,教师和学生认为DOPS-P有助于学习。结论:DOPS-P量表的效度和信度可为学生足部能力成就的评价决策提供支持,有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信