Russian Sources of Qur’ānic Ethnography. III: Hajj from Russia in Russian intelligence Reports (Late 19th — Early 20th Centuries)

A. Kudriavtceva, E. Rezvan, M. Rezvan
{"title":"Russian Sources of Qur’ānic Ethnography. III: Hajj from Russia in Russian intelligence Reports (Late 19th — Early 20th Centuries)","authors":"A. Kudriavtceva, E. Rezvan, M. Rezvan","doi":"10.31250/1238-5018-2022-28-2-56-76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Archival material related to the activities of Russian intelligence in the late 19th — early 20th centuries that aimed at suppressing the spread of pan–Islamic and pan–Turkish propaganda within the Russian Empire and tracking hajji road networks continues to be of serious academic importance. Being the little–studied primary source to the history of Russian Islam they allow us to see the true goals of official St. Petersburg in its policy towards the world of Islam both within the empire and beyond its borders. The article is based on materials related to a series of trips of Russian intelligence officers to the Middle East (Staff Captain ‘Abd al–‘Aziz Davletshin (Istanbul, Jeddah, Mecca, Medina, 1898), Captain Boris Shelkovnikov (Baghdad, Mosul and Basra vilayets of the Ottoman Empire, 1902—1903), Captain Nikolay Terletsky (the Hejaz railway, 1904, 1910), Staff Captain Ilyas Chanyshev (Turkey, Afghanistan and India, 1909—1910), Panteleimon Antaki (Istanbul and Cairo, 1911). The title of the article may seem misleading, but at this stage our task is to present the possible sources of Qur’anic ethnography in all their completeness and originality. Specialists in Arabian ethnography are well aware of the phenomenon of long–term preservation of deeply archaic elements of material culture and economic activities in the region. In this regard, the material of those trips often turns out to be important for Qur’ānic ethnography as well. The commented publication of such material will be the second part of our work. Such British sources are very well known, and their texts are cited, among other things, for historical and ethnographic purposes. Meanwhile, the Russian sources in question remain virtually unknown.The results of Chanyshev and Antaki's trips go beyond the scope of the Qur’anic ethnography proper, but they are important for understanding the problems associated with the hajj from Russia in their entirety.","PeriodicalId":236935,"journal":{"name":"Manuscripta Orientalia. International Journal for Oriental Manuscript Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manuscripta Orientalia. International Journal for Oriental Manuscript Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31250/1238-5018-2022-28-2-56-76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Archival material related to the activities of Russian intelligence in the late 19th — early 20th centuries that aimed at suppressing the spread of pan–Islamic and pan–Turkish propaganda within the Russian Empire and tracking hajji road networks continues to be of serious academic importance. Being the little–studied primary source to the history of Russian Islam they allow us to see the true goals of official St. Petersburg in its policy towards the world of Islam both within the empire and beyond its borders. The article is based on materials related to a series of trips of Russian intelligence officers to the Middle East (Staff Captain ‘Abd al–‘Aziz Davletshin (Istanbul, Jeddah, Mecca, Medina, 1898), Captain Boris Shelkovnikov (Baghdad, Mosul and Basra vilayets of the Ottoman Empire, 1902—1903), Captain Nikolay Terletsky (the Hejaz railway, 1904, 1910), Staff Captain Ilyas Chanyshev (Turkey, Afghanistan and India, 1909—1910), Panteleimon Antaki (Istanbul and Cairo, 1911). The title of the article may seem misleading, but at this stage our task is to present the possible sources of Qur’anic ethnography in all their completeness and originality. Specialists in Arabian ethnography are well aware of the phenomenon of long–term preservation of deeply archaic elements of material culture and economic activities in the region. In this regard, the material of those trips often turns out to be important for Qur’ānic ethnography as well. The commented publication of such material will be the second part of our work. Such British sources are very well known, and their texts are cited, among other things, for historical and ethnographic purposes. Meanwhile, the Russian sources in question remain virtually unknown.The results of Chanyshev and Antaki's trips go beyond the scope of the Qur’anic ethnography proper, but they are important for understanding the problems associated with the hajj from Russia in their entirety.
俄罗斯古兰经的来源ānic民族志。三:俄罗斯情报报告中的俄罗斯朝觐(19世纪末至20世纪初)
与19世纪末至20世纪初俄罗斯情报活动有关的档案材料,旨在压制泛伊斯兰和泛土耳其宣传在俄罗斯帝国内的传播,并追踪朝觐道路网络,仍然具有重要的学术意义。作为很少被研究的俄罗斯伊斯兰教历史的主要来源,它们让我们看到了圣彼得堡官方在帝国内外对伊斯兰世界的政策中的真正目标。这篇文章是基于与俄罗斯情报官员前往中东的一系列旅行相关的材料(Abd al - Aziz Davletshin参谋长(伊斯坦布尔,吉达,麦加,麦地那,1898年),Boris Shelkovnikov上尉(奥斯曼帝国的巴格达,摩苏尔和巴士拉vilayets, 1902-1903年),Nikolay Terletsky上尉(汉贾兹铁路,1904年,1910年),Ilyas Chanyshev参谋长(土耳其,阿富汗和印度,1909-1910),Panteleimon Antaki(伊斯坦布尔和开罗,1911年)。这篇文章的标题可能会让人产生误解,但在这个阶段,我们的任务是呈现《古兰经》民族志的所有完整性和原创性的可能来源。阿拉伯民族志专家很清楚,该地区物质文化和经济活动中非常古老的元素长期保存下来的现象。在这方面,这些旅行的材料往往对古兰经ānic民族志也很重要。这些材料的评论出版将是我们工作的第二部分。这样的英国来源是非常著名的,他们的文本被引用,在其他方面,为历史和民族志的目的。与此同时,俄罗斯的消息来源实际上仍然是未知的。Chanyshev和Antaki旅行的结果超出了《古兰经》民族志本身的范围,但它们对于全面理解与俄罗斯朝觐相关的问题很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信