{"title":"New Formats, Shifting Fortunes: Late-Twentieth-Century KO in the Wild","authors":"J. Furner","doi":"10.5771/9783956507762-142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Three candidates for the knowledge organization (KO) systems that enjoyed the widest, most popular usage in the late twentieth century are (1) Encyclopædia Britannica’s Propædia or “Outline of Knowledge,” (2) the “Synopsis of Categories” at the heart of HarperCollins’ Roget’s International Thesaurus , and (3) OCLC’s Dewey Decimal Classification . Surprisingly, given the popularity of these systems (which continues in the latter two cases into the 2020s), only the last has received special attention in the ISKO community. The goal of this paper is to compare the function, form, and content of each of the three systems, in the context of a taxonomy of evaluation methods for KO applications that takes into account similarities and differences in formats and purposes.","PeriodicalId":314959,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Organization at the Interface","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Organization at the Interface","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783956507762-142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
: Three candidates for the knowledge organization (KO) systems that enjoyed the widest, most popular usage in the late twentieth century are (1) Encyclopædia Britannica’s Propædia or “Outline of Knowledge,” (2) the “Synopsis of Categories” at the heart of HarperCollins’ Roget’s International Thesaurus , and (3) OCLC’s Dewey Decimal Classification . Surprisingly, given the popularity of these systems (which continues in the latter two cases into the 2020s), only the last has received special attention in the ISKO community. The goal of this paper is to compare the function, form, and content of each of the three systems, in the context of a taxonomy of evaluation methods for KO applications that takes into account similarities and differences in formats and purposes.
在20世纪后期,最广泛、最受欢迎的知识组织(KO)系统的三个候选系统是(1)大英百科全书的Propædia或“知识大纲”(Outline of knowledge), (2) HarperCollins的Roget国际同义词词典的核心“类别概要”,以及(3)OCLC的杜威十进分类法。令人惊讶的是,考虑到这些系统的普及(后两种情况将持续到21世纪20年代),只有最后一种系统在ISKO社区得到了特别的关注。本文的目标是在考虑格式和目的的异同的KO应用程序评估方法分类法的上下文中,比较这三个系统的功能、形式和内容。