New Formats, Shifting Fortunes: Late-Twentieth-Century KO in the Wild

J. Furner
{"title":"New Formats, Shifting Fortunes: Late-Twentieth-Century KO in the Wild","authors":"J. Furner","doi":"10.5771/9783956507762-142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Three candidates for the knowledge organization (KO) systems that enjoyed the widest, most popular usage in the late twentieth century are (1) Encyclopædia Britannica’s Propædia or “Outline of Knowledge,” (2) the “Synopsis of Categories” at the heart of HarperCollins’ Roget’s International Thesaurus , and (3) OCLC’s Dewey Decimal Classification . Surprisingly, given the popularity of these systems (which continues in the latter two cases into the 2020s), only the last has received special attention in the ISKO community. The goal of this paper is to compare the function, form, and content of each of the three systems, in the context of a taxonomy of evaluation methods for KO applications that takes into account similarities and differences in formats and purposes.","PeriodicalId":314959,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Organization at the Interface","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Organization at the Interface","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783956507762-142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Three candidates for the knowledge organization (KO) systems that enjoyed the widest, most popular usage in the late twentieth century are (1) Encyclopædia Britannica’s Propædia or “Outline of Knowledge,” (2) the “Synopsis of Categories” at the heart of HarperCollins’ Roget’s International Thesaurus , and (3) OCLC’s Dewey Decimal Classification . Surprisingly, given the popularity of these systems (which continues in the latter two cases into the 2020s), only the last has received special attention in the ISKO community. The goal of this paper is to compare the function, form, and content of each of the three systems, in the context of a taxonomy of evaluation methods for KO applications that takes into account similarities and differences in formats and purposes.
新形式,改变命运:20世纪后期的野外KO
在20世纪后期,最广泛、最受欢迎的知识组织(KO)系统的三个候选系统是(1)大英百科全书的Propædia或“知识大纲”(Outline of knowledge), (2) HarperCollins的Roget国际同义词词典的核心“类别概要”,以及(3)OCLC的杜威十进分类法。令人惊讶的是,考虑到这些系统的普及(后两种情况将持续到21世纪20年代),只有最后一种系统在ISKO社区得到了特别的关注。本文的目标是在考虑格式和目的的异同的KO应用程序评估方法分类法的上下文中,比较这三个系统的功能、形式和内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信