Retrospective review of chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer in the elderly: Does the end justify the means?

M.P.N. Findlay, A.-M. Griffin, D. Raghavan, K.E. McDonald, A.S. Coates, P.J. Duval, P. Gianoutsos
{"title":"Retrospective review of chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer in the elderly: Does the end justify the means?","authors":"M.P.N. Findlay,&nbsp;A.-M. Griffin,&nbsp;D. Raghavan,&nbsp;K.E. McDonald,&nbsp;A.S. Coates,&nbsp;P.J. Duval,&nbsp;P. Gianoutsos","doi":"10.1016/0277-5379(91)90422-A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Between 1978 and 1983, 72 patients aged 70 years or older (median 72, range 70–80) were treated for biopsy-proven, small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Intercurrent disorders were common, including ischaemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, chronic airflow limitation and second malignancies. 26 patients (36%) had limited extent of disease, and 46 (64%) had extensive disease. “Intensive” chemotherapy incorporating vincristine, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin (OCA regimen) was administered to 32 patients [complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) = 84%]; less rigorous regimens (e.g. single agent chemotherapy, planned dose reductions, radiotherapy only) were used in 34 cases (CR + PR = 52%); and 6 received no active treatment. In the intensively treated group, there were 3 treatment-related deaths and 26 episodes of WHO grade 3–4 toxicity. In the less intensively treated group, there were no treatment-induced deaths and only 1 episode of severe toxicity. The overall median survival was 25 weeks (36 weeks for intensive treatment, 16 weeks with less intense treatment). For patients with limited disease only, the median survival in each group was 43 and 26 weeks, respectively. Intensive treatment for elderly patients with small cell lung cancer is associated with substantially increased toxicity and higher response rates than for gentle treatment, but without a major survival benefit.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11925,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0277-5379(91)90422-A","citationCount":"73","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/027753799190422A","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 73

Abstract

Between 1978 and 1983, 72 patients aged 70 years or older (median 72, range 70–80) were treated for biopsy-proven, small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Intercurrent disorders were common, including ischaemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, chronic airflow limitation and second malignancies. 26 patients (36%) had limited extent of disease, and 46 (64%) had extensive disease. “Intensive” chemotherapy incorporating vincristine, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin (OCA regimen) was administered to 32 patients [complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) = 84%]; less rigorous regimens (e.g. single agent chemotherapy, planned dose reductions, radiotherapy only) were used in 34 cases (CR + PR = 52%); and 6 received no active treatment. In the intensively treated group, there were 3 treatment-related deaths and 26 episodes of WHO grade 3–4 toxicity. In the less intensively treated group, there were no treatment-induced deaths and only 1 episode of severe toxicity. The overall median survival was 25 weeks (36 weeks for intensive treatment, 16 weeks with less intense treatment). For patients with limited disease only, the median survival in each group was 43 and 26 weeks, respectively. Intensive treatment for elderly patients with small cell lung cancer is associated with substantially increased toxicity and higher response rates than for gentle treatment, but without a major survival benefit.

老年小细胞肺癌化疗的回顾性回顾:目的是否可以证明手段的合理性?
1978年至1983年间,72名年龄在70岁或以上的患者(中位72人,范围70 - 80人)接受了活检证实的小细胞肺癌(SCLC)治疗。并发疾病很常见,包括缺血性心脏病、周围血管疾病、慢性气流受限和二次恶性肿瘤。局限性病变26例(36%),广泛性病变46例(64%)。32例患者接受了长春新碱、环磷酰胺和阿霉素的“强化”化疗(OCA方案)[完全缓解(CR) +部分缓解(PR) = 84%];不太严格的方案(如单药化疗、计划减量、仅放疗)34例(CR + PR = 52%);6例未接受积极治疗。在强化治疗组中,有3例与治疗相关的死亡和26例WHO 3 - 4级毒性发作。在治疗强度较低的组中,没有治疗引起的死亡,只有1次严重毒性发作。总中位生存期为25周(强化治疗36周,弱强化治疗16周)。对于病情有限的患者,两组的中位生存期分别为43周和26周。老年小细胞肺癌患者的强化治疗与温和治疗相比,毒性显著增加,反应率更高,但没有主要的生存获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信