Homeland Insecurities: Racial Violence the Day after September 11

Muneer I. Ahmad
{"title":"Homeland Insecurities: Racial Violence the Day after September 11","authors":"Muneer I. Ahmad","doi":"10.2979/RACETHMULGLOCON.4.3.337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"t would be naive to ignore how severely the systematic attacks of the Right since September 11 have stalled the critical project of the Left in deconstructing the current political moment. With much of the Left having abandoned its principled commitments and lined up, flags waving, in full support of the Bush administration’s prosecution of the war, a reconstructive project has yet to begin. The decampment of the Left is so dire that the Nation recently proclaimed, without apology, the opinionating of fictional character Huey Freeman in the comic The Boondocks to be “the most biting and consistent critique of the war and its discontents in the nation’s mass media.”1 For months we have been bracing ourselves for the next degradation; “things will get worse before they get better” seemed to be the mantra of despair. This may still be so: With Bush’s threatened expansion of the war beyond Afghanistan, U.S. antipathy toward the Geneva Conventions, and the continuing detention of Arabs, Muslims, and South Asians, the crisis shows no signs of abating. But it is in exactly this moment of nationalist, nativist, and militaristic excess that we might develop greater acuity not only in our critique of prevailing politics, but in the imagined alternatives. Decentering of September 11, as Judith Butler suggests,2 is important to understand the meaning and import of the terrorist attacks. But decentering requires not only that we expand our frame of reference to include the world before September 11, we must envision a desired world after September 11 as well.","PeriodicalId":297214,"journal":{"name":"Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Contexts","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Contexts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/RACETHMULGLOCON.4.3.337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

t would be naive to ignore how severely the systematic attacks of the Right since September 11 have stalled the critical project of the Left in deconstructing the current political moment. With much of the Left having abandoned its principled commitments and lined up, flags waving, in full support of the Bush administration’s prosecution of the war, a reconstructive project has yet to begin. The decampment of the Left is so dire that the Nation recently proclaimed, without apology, the opinionating of fictional character Huey Freeman in the comic The Boondocks to be “the most biting and consistent critique of the war and its discontents in the nation’s mass media.”1 For months we have been bracing ourselves for the next degradation; “things will get worse before they get better” seemed to be the mantra of despair. This may still be so: With Bush’s threatened expansion of the war beyond Afghanistan, U.S. antipathy toward the Geneva Conventions, and the continuing detention of Arabs, Muslims, and South Asians, the crisis shows no signs of abating. But it is in exactly this moment of nationalist, nativist, and militaristic excess that we might develop greater acuity not only in our critique of prevailing politics, but in the imagined alternatives. Decentering of September 11, as Judith Butler suggests,2 is important to understand the meaning and import of the terrorist attacks. But decentering requires not only that we expand our frame of reference to include the world before September 11, we must envision a desired world after September 11 as well.
《国土不安全:911事件后的种族暴力
如果忽视自9 / 11以来右翼的系统性攻击是如何严重地阻碍了左翼解构当前政治时刻的关键项目,那就太天真了。由于许多左翼人士已经放弃了他们的原则承诺,站在一起,挥舞着旗帜,全力支持布什政府对伊拉克战争的起诉,重建计划尚未开始。左派的撤退是如此可怕,以至于《国家》杂志最近毫不道歉地宣布,漫画《荒野》中虚构人物休伊·弗里曼(Huey Freeman)的自以为是,是“美国大众媒体对战争及其不满的最尖锐、最一致的批评”。“几个月来,我们一直在为下一次衰退做准备;“事情在好转之前会变得更糟”似乎是绝望的口头禅。这可能仍然是这样:随着布什威胁将战争扩大到阿富汗以外,美国对日内瓦公约的反感,以及对阿拉伯人,穆斯林和南亚人的持续拘留,危机没有显示出减弱的迹象。但正是在这个民族主义、本土主义和军国主义泛滥的时刻,我们可能不仅在对主流政治的批判上,而且在想象的替代方案上,都变得更加敏锐。正如朱迪思·巴特勒(Judith Butler)所建议的那样,对“9·11”事件进行去中心化处理,对于理解恐怖袭击的意义和重要性非常重要。但是,去中心化不仅要求我们扩大我们的参照系以包括9 / 11之前的世界,我们还必须设想9 / 11之后的理想世界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信