{"title":"Analysis of the different techniques for calculation of bearing capacity of flexural reinforced concrete deep beams","authors":"Beata Levon, Remigijus Šalna, Linas Juknevičius","doi":"10.3846/mbmst.2019.158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with the singularities of the design of deep beams without shear reinforcement according to\ndifferent design codes, namely, STR 2.05.05:2005, EC2, EC2-SMM and ACI-318. The comparative analysis of calculation\nmodels, experimental verification, accuracy of models and the ranking of models according to the Modified Demerit\nPoints Classification (MDP) method are presented. The results shown that despite the systematic error of the\nSTR 2.05.05:2005 method is closest to 1 if compared to the other methods, it is classified as dangerous one according\nto the MDP ranking.","PeriodicalId":169478,"journal":{"name":"The proceedings of the 13th international conference \"Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques\" (MBMST 2019)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The proceedings of the 13th international conference \"Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques\" (MBMST 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/mbmst.2019.158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The paper deals with the singularities of the design of deep beams without shear reinforcement according to
different design codes, namely, STR 2.05.05:2005, EC2, EC2-SMM and ACI-318. The comparative analysis of calculation
models, experimental verification, accuracy of models and the ranking of models according to the Modified Demerit
Points Classification (MDP) method are presented. The results shown that despite the systematic error of the
STR 2.05.05:2005 method is closest to 1 if compared to the other methods, it is classified as dangerous one according
to the MDP ranking.